Jan 17

XsimReviews : Aircraft Review : Supercritical Simulations Group Embraer E-190LR

E 190 Article Header

Review : Supercritical Simulations Group Embraer E-190LR

Back in October 2012 The Supercritical Simulations Group released their Embraer E-170LR E-Jet.

I noted in that review that the SSG team were a very newly formed team of being developers of aircraft to the X-Plane platform, and in a few areas the rookie element of designing and creating a large project product showed through.

With the release of the Embraer E-190LR you can see and feel the progress from the first release of the E-170LR and in how many areas the aircraft has been tightened up.

Outwardly they look the same, but the details are better with the newer release (all the modifications will be made to the E-170 in an (free) upgrade of which SSG have noted they have already started on).

E170 - E190 flight

I flew the E-170 and the E-190 side by side to get a feel of the differences and the E-190 felt much more composed and easier to fly than the E-170.

Put the E-190 through a lot of sectors and the differences shine, It flies really well through all of the flight dynamics, but is that because of that extra length and weight?

E170-E190 size

Side by side the E-170 is almost a third shorter than the E-190 (29.90m to 36.24m).

And the width although they look the same is also different as well (26.00m to 28.72m).

Climb E170

In the air the E-170 climbs like a banshee compared with the E-190 and quickly leaves the E-190 behind even if it does have the uprated GE CF34-10E (82.3 kN per engine) and the A-170 only has 62.3 kN from the GE CF34-8E.

But from here on the E-190LR quickly started to become the better aircraft all round and was significantly better for those extra few months between the two releases.

________________________________

External

Ground Page

E-190 Main shotOutwardly it looks the same as the E-170, and uses many of the same items.

But it does feel far more polished and a better product all round.

E-190 side

E-190 Engines

The detailing is very good.

E-190  gear

But X-Plane lately seems to create too shiny tires which I don’t like…

E-190 Tail

You feel and see the larger size of the E-190 rather than the E-170 and the aircraft is flown more like an airliner than a regional jet. E-190 Door

One new feature on the E-190 is the opening cabin door… yay!

Lighting is also comprehensive and with HDR XP10.

E -190 Lights

E -190 Lights on
A great feature is that if the landing gear is retracted the taxi side lighting is switched off…
E -190 Lights off

Lighting for:

Landing – Nosewheel and Main (left/Right)

Taxi – Nosewheel and Side

Logo

Beacon – Strobe – Nav

________________________________

Cockpit

E-190  CP Main View

 Again like the external aircraft, outwardly the panel looks the same as the E-170 and the basics are just set out like that aircraft.

You can switch the panels around which is convenient.

E-190 lighting

But the shading and reflections are coming in more than on the E-170, A bit more reflection work is needed but it is a big improvement.

So that earlier slightly cartoony look is now starting to fade.

E-190 - Glare

On the turn to finals the glossy light fills out the large panels.

E-190  Panel map

Remember too that modern cockpits are more than bland and grey.

E-190 Centre console

Center console is excellent and really lovely work.

E-190 panel CC

MCDU and Default GPS NAV is a highlight and now getting deeper into the more interesting systems with FADEC logic and thrust limits.

MCDU Pages include:

E -190 Prefs
INIT PERF PAGE (above)

.2 INIT PERF PAGE

TAKEOFF PAGE (set v1 vR v2 – Flaps 10°- 20°)

TO DATASET PAGE  (thrust-limit / ATTCS / FLEX)

CLIMB PAGE (Speed / ECON (Economy) / CRZ ALT Trans)

CRUISE PAGE (Speed / ECON /Max Cruise level / Opt Cruise level / Gross weight)

DESCENT PAGE (Speed / ECON / Restriction SPD – ALT )

APROACH PAGE (VAC 2 / VAC 4 / Vref 5 / Vref 6 / Gross weight / VFS / ALT Trans / Flaps / Flaps Full)

TRS (thrust reduction system) PAGE (thrust Rating)

On each page you can configure the aircraft to the auto procedures.

RADIO has its own page…

E -190 Radio

The only thing I am not crazy about is the engine START/STOP switches, covered by plastic flaps they are annoying to use correctly.

E-190 AP

AP (Autopilot) is well laid out with the sections divided into:

Lateral Mode/Vertical Mode (Guidance) With Flight Path Angle (FPA)/Display Controller/Speed FMS/MAN management.
But the manipulators are messy to use, SSG have tightened them up and they are certainly better on the release version, but from some angles the manipulator is away from the switch (top-left) from the pilot’s seat viewpoint, some are doubled up as well creating a little confusion in the landing phase, SSG have noted they going to rethink them.

The AP can also be deactivated from the ramhorn control columns.

E-190  features

The features panel has also been expanded.

Pilot Seat and yoke (hide) – thank god for this as the seat totally blocks the panels…

Autopilot LEDs visible – as noted on the AP panel image above (green LEDs) – and yes needed, the LED’s are not on the real aircraft, but why not?

UFMC present controls FADEC (for use with plug-ins)

Enable Dial Altitude Limit

Open/Close the (front) DOOR – If the engines are running you get an annoying alarm!

Field of View

50/60/65/70/75/80 fields of view are available, I like 65 – and yes I really like it.

E-190 OH

The overhead panel is very well laid out.

Systems activated are.
ELECTRICAL / FUEL / HYDRAULICS / ICE AND RAIN PROTECTION / LIGHTING (External and Internal) / PNEUMATICS / AUXILIARY POWER UNIT (APU) / FIRE PROTECTION / COMMUNICATIONS.

E -190 MFD

MFD and MAP – The MFD (Main Flight Display) is comprehensive with built-in heading, course and radio frequencies.

E -190 Items E -190 Map

ILS is indicators are excellent and the Map can be configured…. you also have visual systems selection.

Panels listed

Electrical / Status /  Flight Controls / Hyd / Fuel / ECS / Anti ICE

Stall warning works as advertised, I tested the aircraft for stall and at 150knts you had to take action.

E -190 STALL

One note on the cockpit overall, you need your textures set to “very high” (or higher) to get the quality out of the wording, set lower and the blur sets in… It is just not great in the lower settings.

SSG said that to get the higher quality at the lower levels it has to add the bigger 4K textures and a that comes with penalty in frame-rate, keeping it like this will give the aircraft access to people who don’t have the power to run the higher textures.

But SSG have also worked very hard to get the aircraft to run at a better frame-rate with the E-190 over the older E-170 – And it shows on my computer at around a 6 or 7 FPS gain.

On my system I didn’t have any frame-rate issues, but as noted you need to run the textures at a “very high” level and this can cut the frame-rate down and certainly if I was running with HDR on.

So the compromise was HDR on with a “high” texture setting.

textures

The PFD is also too dull, it has been lightened a little but it is still too very darky contrasty for me.

E -190 Cockpit lighting

Night lighting is good but with not much adjustment in the overhead (storm) lighting.

E -190 OH LIT

 

________________________________

Liveries

The Default livery is the Embraer Factory.

E-190  default

Nice is the Frontier “A Whole Different Animal”

E-190 Frontier

Air France

E-190 AF

Air Canada

E-190  Air Canada

KLM

E-190 KLM

And the great JetBlue

E-190 JetBlue

There is a clean White for painters.

E-190  Painkit

Coming soon also is:

AZUL – Brazil / TRIP.
Compas
United
Australia (Virgin Australia or Virgin Blue?)
Flybe

All new liveries will be available from the SSG website.

________________________________

Files and Documents

X-Plane10 has 2 versions XP10 and XP10_Light

Files

Note: The XP10 version is 32Bit only at this time.

X-Plane9 has 2 versions XP9 annd XP9_Light

XP9 Files

Note: the XP9 version does not have the HDR lighting effects

Manual (reference guide) is 88 pages.

________________________________

Prices

The Embraer E -190 is US$24.95

The Embraer E -190 with the E -170 is US$39.95

If you have the E -170 then to add the E -190 to your hangar is only going to cost you US$15.00 (with a coupon from SSG)

Available from the .ORGstoreSSG Embraer E -190

________________________________

Flying

The Embraer‘s are procedural aircraft to fly, more Airbus than Boeing.

So mostly you let the computers do all the work, I don’t really fly like that, I like to set things like speed, climb (rate of climb), cruise, headings and at arrival I follow my STARS but in a natural way by using the headings and the turns to final in my own adjustments.

I get closer to the aircraft this way and this is where I felt the E -170 was a bit compromising, I never felt that way with the E -190, and for anything now within that 2,300nm range – the E -190 will have me at the controls.

It is a very steady aircraft to fly but not stiff, and feeling the aircraft is enjoying it.

Sector after sector I wanted more… and the more I got, It is great in the taxi as well as you can control the thrust precisely for turns around the ramps, touches to the throttle give the right amount of thrust to maneuver or swing around ready to depart.   Thrust control on landing gives you the same control and pleasure.

So I like to fly it manually more than everything set on auto, and that says a lot about the sort of aircraft it is designed to be and doesn’t mean you shouldn’t use all the settings – But it is more of a shuttle than a long-range service aircraft.

________________________________

Evaluation

E -190 AF dawn

If the E -190 had arrived as the same as the E -170 in October I would have been worried, In other words if SSG had just changed the fuselage to make it a bit longer to fit and then just added in the same E -170 cockpit and shoved the wings on it, and said “Hey a E -190!” then you would know that it is a waste of money.

But that is not what has happened, In the few months since the E -170 was released the E -190 has improved by a significant amount, yes both share the same many items – but so then does the real aircraft.

The amount of quality (low cockpit textures aside) now going into SSG products is starting to shine, and remember if you have bought the E -170 it will be soon upgraded to the E -190 standard.

The note at the start of this review is that SSG are still the “new kids on the block” but are now becoming a quality developer that they have great products coming out of their design studios and improving the quality immensely with each release, In time the whole range will be a great set of aircraft and you can see where the fleet is going, US$40 for not one but two versions of Embraer S.A. aircraft is a good deal.

I liked the E -170LR because like SSG it tries hard, But I love the E -190LR because it is just a great aircraft.

E -190 Final

Flightime56

The XsimReview for the Embraer E-170LR is here :  Supercritical Simulations Group Embraer 170LR E-Jet
Supercritical Simulations Group:  Supercritical Simulations Group

Ricardo Bolognini Project leader and primary 3D modeling, flight dynamics
and system programming
Carlos Garcia Director of testing and marketing
George Garrido Textures and repaints
Baber Sikander Additional 3D modeling and textures
Stefan Keller Reference guide development and technical advisor
Tim Gleason Technical advisor and product testing

Computer System:
- 2.66 Ghz Intel Core i5 iMac 27”
- 6 Gb 1067 Mhz DDR3
- ATI Radeon HD 4850 512mb
Software:
- Mac OS MountainLion 10.8.2
- X-Plane 10 Global ver10.10 (Stable)
- ExtremeSceneryMAXX

End Xsimreviews

Dec 21

XsimReview : Aircraft Review : Retro Funk – FlyJSim Boeing 727 Series

 

When the Dash Q400 came out from FlyJSim it divided users squarely into two groups, Those who loved it, those who loved flying it and treasured the aircraft, and then there is those that didn’t like it at all and probably still don’t. They found it hard to fly, Then to land and then they found it just to plainly difficult to use.

I am firmly into the first “I love it” group, and the aircraft was noted as my “best of aircraft for 2011″.

I think I understand why the aircraft firmly divided the community, It took a lot (I mean a real lot) of practise to become really proficient on the aircraft, you have to work really hard in there, with always using constant throttle adjustments, then adjusting your technique to find the right set of skills to fly the Dash really smooth and then sweat yourself silly to get a really good touch landing at the right speed.

On a lost weekend last year I flew six Flybe routes in one day and I was so exhausted I was flat on the floor by my computer just trying to recover after it was all over…  But rewarding, holy batmobile, yes Batman.

And so here now is the next product from FlyJSim in the The Boeing 727 Series. And I feel it will also garner the same reaction as the Q400, but also for closely the same reasons as with the Dash the B727 creates a real schism of emotions – but there is however a slight a difference this time around though as I feel we are more in tune with these sort of complex aircraft now than when the Dash was released.

Very early on in the Boeing 727 cockpit I felt the same contradictions as when I first flew the Dash, but I quickly adopted to the reasoning that I was going to have to adjust my flying to the aircraft. Unlike the Dash the differences here are in the age of the aircraft, Because it is heavy, dirty, slow and with the power available to only just pull the skin off the top of a rice pudding (by today’s standards). But that is not to say you wouldn’t love the Boeing 727 – As it is our youth here that brings these aircraft back to our hearts with the look of past times and the noise on takeoff, These 60′s dinosaurs are still out there flying today, Only now wrapped in their Hushkits they still ply the backwaters delivering Christmas presents between Memphis and Alaska and all the points in between.

Boeing with the 727 took the barrel of the Boeing 707 fuselage and created an aircraft that was perfect for short – medium-range international routes. The distinctive third engine was required for over water operations. It was however mostly popular on domestic routes and with the built-in air-stairs the B727 didn’t require much in facilities to turn it around at far reaching and remote airports. It is the only Boeing Aircraft not to have the engines mounted on the wings. The 727-100 first flew in February 1963 and entered service with Eastern Air Lines in February 1964; the stretched version 727-200 flew in July 1967 and the last 727 was built-in 1984.

There was 1,832 Boeing 727′s built overall with to date (2012), 23 727-100s and 227 727-200s are still in active airline/cargo service.

FlyJSim Boeing 727 Series.

The first thing to note is that the Boeing 727 series is running in 64Bit. As Laminar Research has not yet made 64Bit official then of course there could be still be changes yet to be completed, But I have encountered no issues on my system in running the 64Bit version, The review was done in 10.10Final.

Created by Jack Skieczius and Joe Vermeulen. It is challenge to not only to release an excellent product but to also take on the challenge to recreate a past icon, In both cases I think FlyJSim have succeeded beyond expectations.

The FlyJSim Boeing 727 comes in three versions:

The Original Boeing 727-100

This version comes with three liveries… United (60′s)

Eastern

And American

________________

Second package is the:

Boeing 727-200 Adv

Liveries included with the -200Adv are Pan Am (default)

Alaska Airlines 1993

And the PSA N533PS (smile)

________________

The final version is the:

Boeing 727-200F Freighter.

Freighter liveries include:

Federal Express (FedEx) default.

DHL

and Kelowna Flightcraft

________________

You can purchase either one of the above packages for US$32.00

Or you can purchase the whole series for US62.00

Livery packs also available for US$10.00 per set of which include:

American Classics Packs for 727-200Adv

Europe Pack for 727-200Adv

Global Pack for 727-100

USA Pack for 727 series

Americas Pack for 727 series

Europe Pack for 727 series

Global Pack for 727 Series

Global Pack for 727-200Adv

Or purchase the whole “Complete” set for US19.95

  • 727-100
  • 19 Paints
  • 727-200adv
  • 31 Paints
  • 727-F
  • 4 Paints

A total of 54 liveries and 37 designs by Will Davies (aka Amerrir).

The livery quality throughout is outstanding by Will, and the “Complete” set is great (brilliant) value

________________

Aircraft

 

The Boeing 727 is a traditional Boeing Aircraft from the late 50′s and early 60′s, and FlyjSim’s version does get the feel and the look of the aircraft of the period.

The engines feel small by today’s standards, but the everything was recessed back then, the JT8D fans look stationary but they are working hard deep in within their cowls.

All the engine detail is first-rate, a close up of the engine outlet mesh (below) and the thrust-reverse clam doors of which are well hidden within the pods, but all three work as advertised and are worth a mention.

Main gear detail and animation is excellent, but I don’t like the overshiny tyres, from certain angles they look more like more lights on landing, A fix is coming.

Nose-wheel animation is also first-rate.

In detail on any aircraft I have seen to date nothing comes close to the complexity and shear clever Swiss knife animation of the B727 wings.

The main rear flaps are seriously complex enough.

The leading edge flaps and slats are a clockwork effort of amazing animation, and god knows how long it took to make this all work correctly – and then you have perfect moving wing flex on top of everything else!

If animation work was art then this is a Picasso.

________________

Cockpit

It is quite bright and open in here thanks to those eyebrow windows, The main panel and the overhead panel look empty compared to modern jets but you are forgetting the engineer’s station sited behind the Co-Pilot.

The Period detail produced in the cockpit is sublime.

At first you don’t feel comfortable because everything thing is set out in a more compartmentalized fashion than with today’s workflow ergonomics, In time it does all work out fine but you seem to reaching around to do things that should be usually under your fingertips.

Main panel is as authentic to every scratch mark on the screws.

Pilots instruments are all glass but this is not a modern glass cockpit, period charm is more like it. A WX radar is in there but it only shows the standard X-Plane weather and the FMS route .

There is a small period of adjustment if you haven’t flown heavy pre-glass cockpits, but it soon becomes quite natural, however the missing map panel is glaringly obvious

The center engine panel detail is a power up clockwork heaven.

The Throttle Quadrant looks like it has been milled from real metal…    real perfection is at work here…. works really well too.

The full Radio panel has a rudimentary and ancient Auto-Pilot sitting at the top.

The Autopilot works but it feels and works more like it should be in a G.A aircraft than in an airliner.

Here I had a slight mixed messages period, you make the adjustments by this main panel, but there is another A/P control called the “Flight Director” (below) at the top of forward center-console panel above the levers.

The switch does work but doesn’t go to where you want it to select to, move the same switches on the lower panel and they select the same on the Flight Director versions? The annoyance is that if you want to select the A/P heading which is on the top switch then it won’t go to that position, press the button (HDG SEL) on the lower A/P panel and it does?

What makes it harder is that you have to move a very long way back to do so, and the other switch is sitting right there and very handy…  You do quickly adapt to the situation but it is confusing at first.

FlyJSim noted that the issue is in separating the Flight Director from the lower A/P panel and may have found a workable solution…

Side window reflections are excellent and so is the half-circle taxi turning wheel.

The overhead panel is stark compared to a modern two-man crew layout as most of the fuel, hydraulics and electrical systems are instead laid out on the….

…. Engineers station of which in the B727 is comprehensive with the noted references also laid out.

Each section here is related to their area of operation.

Fuel.

Electrical and Aircraft Pressurization.

so in the B727 most of the overhead panel is related mostly to engine start and the very adjustable and comprehensive aircraft lighting.

The lighting panel is very variable and fully adjustable for the cockpit lighting in a large combination of ways.

Standard lighting

instruments brightness on high.

Red spot.

Storm (or Cabin)

I thought there would have been more backlighting on the instruments, the only really effective one here is the “standby artificial horizon”, the reflections on the glass are perfect, but you don’t get in the B727 that instrument glow that is in Leading Edge’s DC-3 or any of the Carenado aircraft because all the main dials in the B727 are flat and don’t have that convex glass front that creates that effect.

Overhead panel lighting is very good.

And so is the engineer’s station with the APU panel sited on the rear wall.

On the left side of your computer screen is a menu system, now becoming quite commonplace.

The first item is the “V Card” panel.

This shows you (in real-time) the current weights and Vref’s… and very handy it is for setting up the aircraft correctly for takeoff and landing.

Item two is the”Weight and Balance” manager…  If you are familiar with this from the Q400, then you will know how invaluable it is.

Next Item is the “Op” or operations panel.

Here are selectable boxes for:

Cold & Dark start… or

Engines running.

Change the field of view.

Adjust the exterior sound volume.

Time is Zulu (clock)

View FMS in 2d view.

Really a cheat sheet on a 1960′s aircraft, but it make your X-Plane flying easier if you just want to just load and fly.

The last Menu option is the Xciva from Philipp.

Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), airliners were navigated in the early days of Jet aviation mostly by means of radio navigation (VOR, DME, NDB) and connected to the aircraft’s inertial navigation systems.

The most famous of these systems was the Delco Carousel IV-A, which was nicknamed “CIVA”.

Here Philipp has recreated this famous piece of hardware and it can be purchased separately to be included on the flightdeck of the B727 Series, Its purchase can also be used on other products if they are set up for the Xciva Plug-In.

As with most of Philipp’s amazing work and this one included, It is simplistic it its operation, but also quite complex to work through the operations, there is just not enough information in the Xciva manual other than how to use the controls, Philipp is going to do a video to explain how to use it effectively.

The cost of the add-On plugin is US$10.00, and installation is very easy.

________________

Nightlighting

The aircraft’s outside lighting is very good.

With taxi (nosewheel), taxi turning, two sets of landing lights (one set of outer landing lights peak through the leading edge slats) and also wheel bay inspection lights.

There is wing inspection lighting, strobe and standard Beacon/Nav lighting. A note the Boeing 727 does not have any tail logo lighting.

Visual outside cockpit detail is very impressive.

________________

Sounds

The noise level is impressive, certainly on takeoff, and the familiar whine while taxiing will certainly bring back a few tears.

The cockpit is relatively quiet, but you are situated a long way out from the engines, Start-up and shut down is also very realistic and APU sounds are excellent.

The 3d rotation effect is not as good as some others and comes in quite sharply, but at full throttle powering down the runway it easily makes you want to call out high above the roar “fly baby fly!”.

________________

Framerate

Framerate caused me no issues, flying at a highlevel of over 12,000ft i found the framerate running at 66-70fr, with the weather turned on it dropped to 27fr to 33fr which is perfectly acceptable in 10.10 Final

________________

Flying The Boeing 727.

Now the JT8D-17R produces about 17,400 lbf (77 kN) thrust each engine (on the advanced, The -100 only has 14.000lbf)  and x that by three which is 52,200ibf and the CFM56-7B27 that powers the B737-800 has two 27,300 lbf (121 kN) x 2 and so it has 54.600lbf of thrust available.

The B727-200Adv is 209,500 lb (95,000 kg) at MTW and the B737-800 is 174,200 lb  (79,010 kg) at MTW so you can see that the Boeing 737-800 is going to go far quicker off the runway than the B727, and that is what it feels like.

The power is there but you don’t get that sprint off the brakes like you do in a modern airliner, the speed builds steadily and at Vr  you rotate 15° and then steady to 10° till you level off at 1500ft, On the first flight I then did my usual 250knts and 1800fpm climb up towards 12,000ft…  only I didn’t get there.

With the throttle at full power and I am climbing hard until two of the engines start to blow out black smoke on top of the usual black smoke means I was soon in trouble, with only one engine to keep the 200,000lb aircraft aloft I was going nowhere fast, The A/P then said enough is enough and I am soon spiraling down towards the ground very fast and I hit quite hard.

You can laugh at my naivety but the lesson was learnt, most commentators of the 60′s note the early Boeing’s were built like Iron ships and the engines at that time were notably powerful, but they can’t do what modern FADEC engines can do today.

Like the flying the Dash on the throttle you are now the FADEC. your hand on the throttle levers is the monitor between how much the engines can do and how much they can take, At first I was “lets see what this baby can do”, but after a few fights I was keeping them very much within their limits, finding that zone of using the power but not over working the engines in that they may break a seal.

Climbing is a tradeoff, the aircraft is heavy and if you get the climb rate wrong then the speed drops and once it starts to drop it is very hard to get it back, you then soon find yourself into a stall as the speed goes (and keeps on and on lowering) away, then the A/P pops and you are going down in a spiral (again!) – (I called it the “death spiral”) and you end up like another episode of “Aircraft  Investigations”.

I learnt very quickly on how to recover well from these stalls!… or be aware of when they are about to happen.

If you have managed the climb speed zone well then as you level off the speed soon builds up and then you are soon at overspeed and 350kts+ at 12,000ft….

So you do soon learn to fly the B727 on the throttle, find that smooth spot, watching the speed so it does not runaway from you or stall, keeping it within 300kts and .78 mach on the final climb to cruise, then pleasure becomes immense when you get it right and suddenly you find that it all sounds like flying?… the Dash!

Settle the aircraft and B727 will fly smoothly anywhere all day. In any turns the speed drops slightly and then recovers.

On landing you are again working the throttle, coming down from a high flight level you have to really careful not to let the nose go too high and as you can go into a deep stall and where the stalled air from the wings can interrupt the function of the T-tail elevator, I used the air-brakes a lot to contain the speed of which is something I rarely do.

Dropping the flaps and it is like throwing an anchor out of the back, the drag is high and you need the power to stop the speed falling well below what your next setting is, so you are dancing usually between the throttle, flaps and speed to get the flow right and watching the stall…   In many ways it is like flying a really big and very heavy G.A. aircraft in the landing phase.

On landing the thrust-reversers go into full power reverse but the speed comes down slowly, the bulk and weight shows, just as it did on takeoff…..  Taxiing is a breeze at around 10knts on the turns.  A trick with the real aircraft is that the B727 can reverse on the reverse thrust (that remote airport turnaround without a pushtruck trick) , but don’t hit the brakes to stop because it will send the nose off the ground!   Just slowly come off the reverse-thrust.

Every flight is different, In modern aircraft you keep to the profile pretty closely in every sector, but with the Boeing 727 it is always different in speed or climb depending on the wind or how are the engines feeling today and if can you push or coax them to do what you want them to do.

So the feedback from the aircraft is significant in the speed, power and weight – and you have to manage them all.

You are going to have to get into the B727 and feel its systems and that will take time to get the very best out of it, You lick your lips at the thought of a long haul – but the workload is going to be high without all your gee-wizz gadgets.

________________

Conclusion.

If you loved the FlyJSim Dash Q400 then you will love the Boeing 727 Series and for all the same reasons.

It is the constant activity that you dig deep here for, mostly for the speed control with the throttle that gives you the impression that you and not the aircraft systems are flying this bird.

To say that flying the B727 is pure is a bit dumb as the systems are old-fashioned, but you are more connected in the air more in this 1960′s style of flying than with the Airbus fly-by-wire push button approach philosophy.

It would be hard for a novice to get the best out of this aircraft, I am not saying the B727 series is inaccessible to some users as anything can be mastered with practise.   But they must be prepared to put in the time to master the flow and challenge of a product on this level.

The more you fly the B727 then the more you understand the dynamics behind it…. like all FlyJSim products they open up to you only after a fair period of time.

I was slightly disappointed I couldn’t run the freighter like I wanted to with no opening doors or sitting cargo, because in today’s world that is how many of the B727′s still flying cut their daily crust, but the cabins and other features will come over a short period of time and with full of the quality we expect from FlyJSim and will be a free add-on-addition.

The amount of work and skill in creating this sort of product is mindbending, At first it feels quite blank till you spend some real-time with it and then the detail creeps out of every pore of its hull and equipment, the wings are a masterpiece of construction and the cockpit detailing on the panels is astounding.

The shear quality and the volume of liveries also covers absolutely every angle you may need, yes some are in the smaller packs but the “complete” set is certainly great value and quality.

You don’t fly the Boeing 727, you live with it and once it is in your hangar it begs to be used and flown like the old trooper it is….   and it leaves you always at the end of the day in a “Retro Funk”.

Flightime56

The FlyJsim Boeing 727 series is available here: www.flyjsim.com or here at the .orgStore Boeing Aircraft 727 Series

The sets of livery packs are available here: Livery Packs 727

Xciva is available here : CIVA Navigation System

Manuals and documentation is:

FJS-727 SeriesSystemsManual (55 Pages)

FJS-727 SeriesManouversManual (9 pages)

FJS-727 SeriesChecklistandProceduresManual (67 pages)

Download: 776.4mb Full version – 967.9mb expanaded

Xciva : download 4.1mb

 

________________

FT56©2012

 

 

Dec 05

XsimReviews : Aircraft Reviews – Remos GX – CSA SportCruiser (Pipersport)

There are no boundaries to flying in X-Plane, I can say with considerable confidence that I can fly an Airbus A380 almost like a true-pro (well without the years of training, health checks, check rating and hours on the actual airframe. But I am pretty good-by X-Plane standards)

So if I did buy an A380, and used it as I would in general day-to-day flying, I gather it would not be a very practical thing to do, in fact all my life savings would give me only enough fuel to go about 100NM (but hey what a great 100NM it would be!)

In a more realistic bound world we are mostly connected to either General Aviation Aircraft or for most of us it is usually on a level of a light Sport Aircraft or an Ultralight.
vFlyteAir specializes in ultra light-weight aircraft in X-Plane, and so to get a dose of reality I decided to check out the sort of aircraft that if you really bought an aircraft and really wanted to fly one cheaply then this is what you would use.

The images (above) also really highlight another factor….  Scale.

We hop into the A380 and usually fly it halfway around the world, but the scale is quite big and huge compared to the little ultra light, it shows how well X-Plane does scale in relation to the real world and the developer’s craft required to do both aircraft.

Walker from vFlyteAir dropped in to KLAL (Lakeland) two of the light weight products that they sell, the Remos GX (built-in Germany) and the CSA SportCruiser (Czech) with is also licenced by PiperSport in the USA.

One is a low wing and another is a high, but in both cases the wings are very similar in design and function.

We will give the SportCruiser a circuit first.

It has a one piece lift up canopy to allow access.

You get the right feel of an entry-level aircraft that is built to a price.

But today even on entry-level aircraft they have modern systems that even a few years ago you would die for. Considering their huge differences between the A380 and then down at this low light category they both still have something in common.

There are very few dials in here and it a glass cockpits for the masses.

The panel Dynon D 120 has three functions, on the left is the PFD (Primary Flight Display) and on the right engine management….  or.

VOR/Nav display, It must be noted the Dynon D100 is not the representative version in this aircraft and may be replaced in the future with another more up to date panel.

The lowers buttons are the basic Omni-bearing selector up/down and Barometer setting up/down (not applied here) and the Engine/Nav page switches.

Centre stack is :

Audio Selector

Garmin GPS430

Garmin GTX 327 Transponder

Garmin SL30 COM/NAV Radio

Right dial is a Speed indicator (knts)

and a basic but very easy to use 2 axis DigiFlight II VS HDG and ALT autopilot…

I found the Dynon displays a little less sharper (blurry) than the Remos version, but an upgrade to those textures is due about now and will be the same as the newer changes completed on the Remos from vFlyteAir, otherwise everything was well laid out and readable.

The first thing you notice is the wing, It has a very large area of 132.30 sq ft and with a very light aircraft these little machines have a lot of lift, a short hop and your quickly flying.

Propeller torque is quite strong as well so you need to use the rudder, best rate of climb (Vy) with the BRP-Rotax 98.6 hp (73.5 kW) engine is about 62 kts to a maximum speed of 119 knts, I found that cruising just under 100kts was the best at around 1000-2000ft (ceiling 3000ft)…   Range is about 516 NM which is a fair distance for a small aircraft.

So you are not going to go very high or very fast. But you are going to get up there.


There is a blind to cover over the sun, But it feels empty in there, It almost like a drone aircraft with the pilot sitting on the ground and the controls all moving by remote-control.

The modelling is very good for this style.

And the lighting is X-Plane10 ready, In fact I had no issues flying in X-Plane10 and 64BIT with either aircraft.

Two liveries in Blue (default)

Red.

All in all it is a great sports aircraft, it is very lightweight, feels and flies like a very light but tight machine – next up is the…

Remos GX

The Remos GX has just had an update and it shows, certainly in the quality of the textures.

You feel more enclosed than in the SportCruiser and also more like a small GA than the home-built sort of aircraft.

Wing area is a a lot less at 118 sq ft but it feels about the same size as the SC. But it is far faster though at 134kts (Vne), I tried to let the SportCruiser try to catch me up but it failed every time even if I was sitting around in the Remos on Idle. So the Remos is the “Sports” of the two…

The engine is a Bombardier-Rotax with 73.6 kW / 100 HP.

But that speed is in a straight line, if you want to turn then you have to drop to well under 100kts. (95knts) (Va), ceiling is 15,000ft so in every area the Remos simply out flies the SC except in the range which is around 480NM.

It is certainly that great step up aircraft between a lightweight Ultralight and a G.A. Aircraft and the Remos GX is leaning more towards the larger G.A. category.

The layout is similar to the SC but is more comprehensive in switches and dials, The centre stack is almost identical to the SC but with an extra Garmin SL30 COM/NAV Radio installed.

The Dynon in the Remos is smaller in the PFD but all instruments including the NAV/DME and the engine information are displayed.   A note on both Dynons is that they can display approach ILS/DME details (height/range/centralise) but won’t capture the instrument, but still are a very good guide for the approach and landing (training).

The display is switchable from GPS (above) to NAV (below)…

The DigiFlight II VS 2-Axis Autopilot is here as well.

Switches for lights are rocker and very well done, only the Carb heat slider knob works but the others are in the works.

Interior detail is well done, It feels like a modern construction.

Curves and modelling are well done.

Lovely wing and detail.

Two liveries are included…  Blue (default)

Green-Blue

Nightlighting is excellent but basic for this sort of machine.

Panel (above) and the external (below)…

Side cockpit view is realistic.

Doors open wide for access.

And the interior is well detailed, Again no pilot like the SC and you notice that empty space.

Both the Remos GX and the SportCruiser are priced at US$16.95 each from…   vFlyteAir

Both come with a manual and a Pilot Operating Handbook (POH)

If you want a taste of the designs from vFlyteAir then they have released in freeware the Tecnam Bravo P2004  ->  Tecnam Bravo

But I will stress that the quality is last generation and was not upgraded to the standard of both of these reviewed aircraft.

Again a great little trainer to cut your first steps on.

The panel is quite good as well, and it comes in the standard default Blue/White/Red livery and another in Red/White/Yellow (below).

The point of this article was that we will never sit in the left seat of an Airbus A380, but there is always the good chance we may have a go and even own and fly one of these aircraft or something similar.

To train or learn to fly in one of these machines is no flight of fancy, but they are a realistic dream that we all share. they are also extremely capable and have very modern instrumentation and have a genuine range of around 500NM (900kms).

A few dollars here can set you up and train you ready if you are in the market or if you want to keep up your flying and navigation skills while on the ground in this light-sport category.

And above all they give off a quite free attitude to flying and are immense fun to travel in at a speed well below the takeoff roll of your larger jet.

Flightime56

Credits: Thanks to Peter Hager for the A380, And Qantas Airlines for allowing the comparison photo-shoot!

FT56©2012

Nov 10

XsimReviews : Aircraft Review : Carenado C337H Skymaster

As an eleven year old I would jump most weekends on to my (bright yellow) Chopper bike and head straight  down to Squires Gate Lane. Blackpool Airport, UK,  which is not exactly the centre of the aviation universe, but at least you could get really close to the aircraft, The sounds of a H.P. Herald (Twin Dart Engines) of British United Island Airways would excite me to death as held on to my huge brown radio to listen into the ATC…

In between these thrills (every one hour and thirty minutes) I would take stock of the other less than thrilling machines spread around the grass parking areas. Most aircraft parked up where Cessna 172′s and rows of Piper PA-28 Cherokee’s, and then there was one other type that was quite odd (to an eleven year old) and that was because it had a spare engine situated on the back… “handy is a spare engine?”.

It was of course the C337H Skymaster and there was just two of them, It stood out as well because of its long twin boom tails that looked exotic and experimental of a sort of Skunk Works for G.A. aircraft (I lived a very sheltered life back then). But the really exciting thing of this machine was on the few occasions that I was there when it flew out of the airport was the amazing sound (or very noisy sound) it made and back then I thought they had made a major engineering mistake of that in the fact that the propellers both went in totally wrong different directions. But flew it did and in its own little world it was an exciting aircraft that never really left my early consciousness and when Daniel Klaue mentioned that the next Carenado aircraft was special to him and it was an odd engined machine then the hairs went straight up on the back off my neck and I was suddenly again an eleven year old boy clutching a huge radio with a broken aerial looking at this “Skymaster” type of aircraft.

I was suddenly very excited and extremely happy at the thought of finally getting into this odd strange noisy aircraft and finding out all its secrets.

I was nervous on this aircraft because what if it didn’t live up to my wildly exaggerated early memories…

It still looked as exotic as ever..

The very first thing you note is how really, really small it is inside…

And it is odd in that it feels higher than wider because of the engine is mounted high at the rear.

Those twin tails are there and still look wonderful.

The C337H still gives off the air of something more experimental than just your average standard G.A. aircraft…

The first Skymaster first flew on February 28th, 1961, and it went into production in May 1963. In 1965 Cessna introduced the model 337 Super Skymaster.This model was larger, and had more powerful engines, retractable landing gear, and a dorsal air scoop for the rear engine and then “Super” name was subsequently dropped.

Cessna built altogether 2993 Skymasters of all variants, including the famous 513 military O-2 versions. Production in America was finally stopped in 1982. If you want to by one today the average price is around US$70,000.

Sit inside the C337H and it feels very tight, lets say that you should be really, really good friends with your co-pilot or your second seat passenger as it feels that small.

The rear is also odd as the passengers sit low and that high roof line is high.

Carenado have with the C337H for the first time created a v10 version as well as its usual v9 standard, they are reluctant to endorse it as wholly completed product because still in some areas they feel that X-Plane10 and mostly in the aircraft functionality that there are still some very grey areas that have not been addressed yet by Laminar Research, They do however with feedback from this release want to do an update fairly quickly to address a few of these areas like the trim indicator, brake handle, some sounds and a few other bugs.

Certainly our feedback is important on these issues, but for now you can stick with ver9 aircraft and know it is correct.

However you do get the advantages of the X-Plane 10 features if you do change the other version which is included in the download (You physically have to change to which version (v10 or v9) that you want to use and it is noted under the “REPLACEMENT ACF FOR V10″ folder).

So what are the benefits?….. on the same “high” texture settings this panel is from Version9.  (I will note that all panel images here have been left at their full size for you to see the details)

It looks good until you look closely, and most of the writing is slightly blurry and the same as most of the current Carenado aircraft releases so far…

Change to the Hi-Def but more importantly V10 engine and the differences are striking.

overwhelmingly so…

The detail now is like when you tried to read the cockpit with bad old glasses and then you went and bought some newer adjusted focals and suddenly the world now is totally different…. it is a real “I can see!” moment.

You can now read everything and at the same texture (“high”) setting…

The detailing just simply outstanding, everything is readable and more importantly it is useable because you are now not guessing what that switch is or what button is what.

The panel textures are so real, even my own real world car’s dashboard textures are not even that good…

Now right down to the smallest writing on the windows you can read everything perfectly…

Panel reflections are simply real world stuff. As you can see the rear of your yoke perfectly in the instruments.

It took awhile to take in how good this really was, then….  then as night falls!

It is stunning stuff….

And the panel lighting so adjustable to your likeness.

The (four) blue glare shield lights (and some more down around the main instruments) contrast with the normal 3-d instrument lighting and it is all so sharp and clearly readable.

Outside looking in it still looks like you standing next to the aircraft.

And from the rear seats.

To look at the panel’s details I feel it is best to see them in operation.

Start those two engines and it is a strange sensation, The C337H is noted as a Twin- Engined aircraft and you must have a multi-engined license to fly it, Its configuration is noted as centreline or Push-Pull and in a few instances as In-Line.

Turn the starter for the rear engine and It chugs into life, Do the same to the front engine and your rocking, in fact the different propeller directions give the aircraft a strange feel and a very distinctive sound.

Cluedos to Carenado for their sounds, they are amazingly good… how good.

Pull those two mixture levers to the very lowest you can without cutting the engine and it is a chugga, chugga, tock, tock chugga sound of an engine barely trying to function, then adjust the levers up so one engine is out of sync with the other and you can tell which engine is doing the work.

You can almost smell the oil, the heat… I would love anything more on this aircraft as to just to be able to remove a panel and see the Continental IO-360-G engines running (Certainly the rear one)…

It is nice to taxi and direct, and sounds really great in the 3-d surround. Carenado notes all sounds come from the real aircraft.

Down the centreline of the runway and you are ready for that common 208C Caravan torque pull, but here nothing happens and you go straight down the centre like a bullet, be aware of the large amount of twin tail area as the rudders don’t need much movement, ditto that large elevator and remember the rear engine thrust flow is right on it.

You would think it would be over-powered, but it is not and your top speed is around 199 mph (173 kn, 320 km/h) at sea level, ceiling is 19.500ft and a normal cruise speed is around 125 knots, (232 km/h) at around 10,000ft.

I found it very agile and easy to settle in the air. Turns and balance are so good that the C447H is soon a very easy and relaxing place to find a flow and not in having to do the usual fighting to look for the autopilot to take your work load away.

There was a tendency on the very early models of the Skymaster of that the rear engine would overheat, and mostly if you had to taxi a long way to the runway. Most of the Skymaster accidents were caused by the rear engine failing and pilots not having enough power to climb into the air with only using the front one.

On the later models a rooftop scoop was added to help with the airflow.

This overheating may be a feature for this model in the future if Laminar can do such adjustments in the simulator, but for now you can try another trick…

Both engines have adjustable cooling cowlings, on the rear engine they are on the side of the fuselage.

power away for a while and it shows on the gauges.

The front cooling cowlings are situated around the exhausts.

shut them and you get a better view of the exhausts themselves.

magnificent beasts they are, watch them closely as they significantly vibrate to the engine, the rear engine exhausts move as well but not as much as the front.

in the cockpit the panel is very different from past Carenado aircraft.

Digital engine readout display and a really great push button Autopilot system. you just want push those lovely green buttons.

switches click-clack, knobs twirl with precision, well as good as any in X-Plane10.

Throttle, feather and mixture levers can be operated singular or together. The trim wheel is easy to the feel (the yaw wheel is situated low down)

An odd switch is that there another AP (autopilot) switch way down on this same centre column?

Radio stack includes a Garmin GNS430, Collins Nav/Com (x2) and King’s ADF (x2) and Transponder.

The LeanAssist is also semi-functional.  The peak indicators simply cycle around on a timer… and there’s a randomizer to simulate the hottest cylinder temperatures at a +/- 5%

Detailing on the roof gives you both engine fuel selection switches, vents and a cabin light further to the rear.

The speaker mesh shows the detail…

The two pilots take home average work pay, so they won’t ruin your bank account dry.

There is one white default livery and five trim liveries.

Blue…

Red…

Grey…

Australian Westpac “COASTGUARD”

RHODESIAN_AF

It is a shame there is no O-2 livery or a firefighting livery. But the C337H does look really good in the dark green.

The C337H took a little practice to get the nose to go down, the adjustment is right down low with that AP switch (and yaw wheel), pulling back on the mixture/power you had to be really careful as not to shutoff either engine.

The AP approach works perfectly and will align you up with the runway with a set of easy turns, NAV1/NAV2/DME is a digital display which is switchable to the right freq.

The flaps don’t pull you down too much if your speed in on the correct money…

You really wonder where they could store an undercarriage in a fuselage this small, but they do and wonders of wonders it all curls out.

Detail is again first-rate.

Even if you got an engine out at this point it wouldn’t cause you any dramas, the heavy yaw of an engine out wouldn’t just happen unlike on a normal twin.

At this point I am finding myself landing a little too fast, so it tends to hop a couple of bounces and the brakes feel a little weak pulling the speed down and i don’t want to pull up too hard in case they burst and seize – I really hate that then in having to drag the plane around under full power?

But I do like the taxi as it has no sharp surprises.

The version9 lighting (above) is in contrast to the sharp v10 lighting (below).

There is a menu C & O on the left of your screen that gives you two items.

C is Cameras with 10 views to choose from and with an adjustable Field of View.

O is the “Options” (option?) which gives you five.

Baggage Door with a parcel and a bag, window reflections, Static Elements like chocks, tags and cones, easy opening of the main side door and tinted blue windows (Very nice).

Conclusions:

It would be hard even a few months ago to accept that Careando could still step up higher in every area, but somehow they have and to the point that even the 208C Caravan needs that Version10 magic to come up to and finding itself now matching the Skymaster.

You easily accept the small niggles so early in the change to V10 because the texture benefits and lighting is so very good and with so little impact on framerate…

It is a complex and highly detailed aircraft, but being able to keep your texture setting in only the “high” position and receive such excellent Hi-Def quality in all of the aircraft and the shear readability of the panel sets this Carenado levels higher than anything Carenado have delivered in the past. That main panel alone is simply awe-inspiring in detail and texturing.

You feel that slight framerate push here and there, but it never intrudes into the flying or ruins the experience.

Carenado have mentioned they intend to upgrade their products with better Garmins and other add-on items in the future. Of which would be a very nice to have in this aircraft – but no promises yet.

But for that eleven year old boy he has now flown his dream aircraft thanks to Carenado – so what is it like?

Perfect!… A little on the tight side and still a little noisy…   but a master of an aircraft….  A Skymaster!

 

You can purchase the Carenado C337H Skymaster here : Carenado C337H Skymaster

Price : US$29.95

Included Documents:

C337H Skymaster General Information.

C337H Skymaster Normal & Emergency Procedures – Performance tables

C337H Skymaster Reference

Carenado Joystick settings

Recommended Settings X-Plane

(I recommend you read the setup details provided)

Download size : 247.20mb

File size : 319.30mb

Flightime56

FT56©2012

 

 

 

Oct 13

x+sim+reviews + 12 October 2012

We’ve heard that the latest v1.51 CRJ update is a winner, and also note that the OrgStore is now showing AeroSOFT’s EHAM front and center. Again, both are most highly recommended files – if you have the hardware muscle handle them, so if you haven’t got these one onboard yet – give them some serious thought. In other news:

  • Manufacturers, airplane owners and the Federal Aviation Administration are working together to reduce the cost of general aviation. AOPA and the General Aviation Manufacturers Association jointly hosted a webinar recently to update all on the work the FAA’s Part 23 Reorganization Aviation Rulemaking Committee has been doing. The rules and regulations of Part 23 have been held responsible by many for the soaring costs of general aviation. The invitation to the webinar said, “In order to counter the stable and negative trends in light general aviation, the ARC plans to make some ground-shifting recommendations which will require the knowledge and participation of the entire aviation community to become successful.” General Aviation News/Capital Comments blog
  • Wichita, Kan., Mayor Carl Brewer will lead a delegation of city, state, and business leaders on a five-city development trip to China next week. One of the highlights will be a meeting with Superior Aviation Beijing, the potential buyer of Hawker Beechcraft. “It’s important for us, for the lives of 4,000-some employee … that we’re paying attention and know what’s going on,” Brewer said. The Wichita Eagle (Kan.)
  • Airplane Geeks talks with director Adam White and producer Kara Martinelli, creators of the documentary film “The Restorers.” “War bird restorations connect people to their past,” said White. Also discussed are the old Cleveland air races and Bob Odegaard’s Super Corsairs.Airplane Geeks Podcast
  • iPad or iPhone that can connect to up to five devices at the same time. A WAAS GPS signal can be sent from one GPS Pro to your iPad, your iPhone as a backup, to the co-pilot’s iPad or to passengers. Backlit LCD screen gives you important information at a glance. Data logging function records the last 100 hours of flight for later viewing on a map. Available exclusively at MyGoFlight.com
  • A new partnership between Pall Corp. and Carson Helicopters Inc. will upgrade the design of the Centrisep engine advanced protection system for Sikorsky Sea King/S-61 helicopters. Efforts will go toward reducing weight and improving performance and operating efficiency over the existing S-61 EAPS system. “The newest enhancement of the Pall Centrisep EAPS will be especially valuable to those aircraft currently in service without engine protection systems,” said Vince Northfield, president, Pall Aerospace. DailyFinance.com/Business Wire/The Motley Fool
  • Cessna 150 models L & M have been added to the existing approval for Cessna models 120, 140 and 150 A through K for Wag-Aero’s complete muffler system. Replacement parts start at $353. General Aviation News
  • Austrian helicopter and would-be space-diver Felix Baumgartner hopes to break at three records with the highest and fastest freefall jump ever. If he is successful, he will also be the first human to break the speed barrier without an aircraft. “I love a challenge, and trying to become the first person to break the speed of sound in freefall is a challenge like no other,” said Baumgartner. Yahoo
  • The Federal Aviation Administration has renewed partnerships with aviation entrepreneur and educator Jamail Larkins and Build A Plane, a nonprofit that helps students build and restore airplanes. These partnerships are intended to “inspire students across the nation to explore the many opportunities that aviation and aerospace careers offer,” said Michael Huerta, acting FAA administrator. AVweb
  • AOPA’s Aviation Summit isn’t the only event drawing aviation professionals to Palm Springs, Calif.: Piper aircraft executives are there to show off the Meridian at the Ferrari Club of America’s annual meeting. The six-seater is a single-engine turboprop with a maximum speed of 260 KTAS and a price tag of around $2.1 million. “Ferrari drivers and Piper drivers share deep appreciation for exquisite design, superb quality and exhilarating performance, and we always have a great time together,” said Drew McEwen, head of global sales and business development for Piper Aircraft. General Aviation News
  • GE Aviation, a division of General Electric Co., will start accepting applications for its new Ellisville, Miss., composites factory on Nov. 5. Starting in March, the company expects to hire 250 workers. To meet growing demand, the company is investing $56 million in the plant.Bloomberg Businessweek/The Associated Press
  • Albuquerque, N.M.-based Aspen Avionics says it has landed $12.8 million in new financing from several investment groups. “These new investment dollars will assure that we can continue our growth as a major player in our industry,” said Aspen’s president and CEO, John Uczekaj, in a news release. The company builds high-tech instruments for general aviation cockpits. American City Business Journals/Albuquerque, N.M.
  • Opposition to the president’s proposed $100 per flight user fee is growing locally and nationally. While petitions circulate on the Internet, officials at the Smyrna/Rutherford County Airport in Tennessee are expressing their concerns. Executive Director John Black believes the fee would affect the airport and the community it serves. “Our job is to make the airport grow and support the local community,” said Black. “We don’t want to see anything that will detract from that.” WTVF-TV (Nashville, Tenn.)
  • Aurora, Ore., kit plane manufacturer Van’s Aircraft is moving into the factory-built market, announcing it will produce an initial run of 12 special light sport RV-12s. AOPA Online
  • European Union Transport Commissioner Siim Kallas is expected to give a speech today warning of legal action his department will take against member countries that are not compliant with the EU’s Single European Sky program. The program was adopted by the EU and its members in recent years to create a more efficient air traffic management system, but not all air traffic management agencies have made the required changes. The Wall Street Journal

And speaking of this last item, how about that Syrian Air flight “asked” to land in Turkey, and that was carrying embargoed missile parts, and in one report: “chemical weapons”, and from Russia. And it seems like Iran is hell bent on pulling as many neighbors as possible into a wider conflict too, hmmm? Maybe to divert Israeli attention from a flock of Strike Eagles taking off and heading east? Say right before an election? Could these items be linked? Oh, my, who’d have thought? No wonder Obama looked distracted in Debate 1.

Welcome to the New World Disorder, anyone?

So, is it time to put some order back into our lives?

Well… Let’s look at some files!

+++++

V FLYTE AIR’s Czech Sport Cruiser + purchase link:

http://www.vflyteair.com/#ecwid:category=0&mode=product&product=15797000

YMTZ | Mount Elizabeth Station + xplaneuser

download link: http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=17569

Two interesting files here: the first, a spirited, indeed a fun little ACF crafted by the same fella making the Remos GT and Tecnam Bravo; the second, one of the most desolate, yet well crafted little ortho airports I’ve seen in a while.

First up, the Czech Sport Cruiser. This is another payware effort from Texas Ranger, the developer at V Flyte Air, and priced at 16 bucks and some change it’s not going to hurt your weekend spending plans, and that said you’ll want to consider this file if you enjoy light sport/GA trainers for puttering around in, or hold a particular interest in this aircraft…the real one, that is. And I mention this advisedly, because this file was in a sense almost co-developed with a real CSC pilot, the flight model has been appropriately well tuned, and the feel is lively yet easy to handle. Also, the panel appears spot-on accurate. The aircraft is in the lightweight category, yet features an impressive all glass panel well suited to side-by-side training, and with a useful payload of almost 600 pounds (263 kilos) the aircraft has a range of 630 SM while cruising at 133 KIAS. Note: a stall speed in the mid-30s almost guarantees exceptional short field performance, upping the fun factor here.

Also, we note that the developer’s modeling skills are improving, and with dynamic shadows enabled in XP10 I felt the interior a nice step up from his earlier Remos/Tecnam efforts. You’ll not yet mistake this for Carenado quality, but it’s this developers aim to get there. That said, one other factor comes into play: purchasing this file to help further development, but as always, that’s a personal call.

So, let’s move on for a moment to the scenery, as it has a part to play in this tale as well. Mount Elizabeth Station is a resort area located in the far NW Outback, with 4WD tours to pristine riverine gorges tops on the list of scenic “to-dos” and viewing pythons in the wild an activity I’d just as soon skip. Of more immediate interest, the ortho is breathtakingly rich, even at lower altitudes, with cattle trails noted and nice fencing added, but there’s actually very little at the airport other than a couple of static GA aircraft and a gate to keep the cows of the runway. It is, in a word, perfect.

And the Sport Cruiser is the perfect way to explore the area around the Station, and you’ll want to, too. With good geography decently rendered in XP, and with the ACF offering an expansive forward view over the 3D panel, I’d be hard pressed to think of many ACF in XP better suited to such scenic ramblings…

Below, the area in Google Earth, and a few of the resorts areas buildings left side of the image. The area reminds me of West Texas, and at 16-1800MSL I’d imagine the evenings are cool and the days quite warm, and a fun place to visit.

The ACF has more than enough instrumentation to get you around the area, and range enough to see you safely on to larger airports in the region. Night lighting is up to the task too.

Concerning the scenery, I had to set “trees” to none to keep them off the runway, so perhaps an exclusion zone is in order? Beyond that, Mount Elizabeth makes for a fun weekend challenge; Derby, Beagle Bay, Gibb River and Truscott are all within easy cruising distance, and the V Flyte Air Sport Cruiser will make a fun glass paneled alternative to a Carenado ACF for the journey. With it’s real world pilot input, this plane ought to be on your list of files to check out.

+++++

GEML Melilla | Spain + Petethalight

download link: http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=17577

So…a Spanish airport in North Africa. Whodathunkit?

And Petethalight’s GEML is one heckuva nice freeware file, too, and within easy RJ range of Gibraltar, Madrid, and Barcelona, or any number of Moroccan airports for GA use. Here’s the list of carriers:

Helitt Líneas Aéreas Barcelona, Madrid, Málaga
Iberia Air Nostrum Almería, Barcelona, Granada, Madrid, Málaga, Palma de Mallorca, Valencia

And here’s the overhead imagery for orientation:

All in all, a very nice affair, and an excellent addition for RJ/Q OPS.

+++++

DXNG | Niamtougou + AlexCohrs

download link: http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=17576

AlexCohrs follows-up his interesting and quite useful Ghanian package with this airport in neighboring Togo, thereby increasing the number of decent facilities in Western Africa. This is the second largest airport in Togo and is primarily a military/police facility, and attempts to get commercial OPS into the area have proven futile. Regardless, a VA could certainly use this airport for regional OPS.

All in all, well done, and recommended.

+++++

KOKK | Kokomo Indiana + Harrison Sanders

download link: http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=17575

A seasoned effort from Harrison Sanders, this is a very well done GA airport, and the vast majority of aircraft here are single engine aircraft. v10 GI compliant, this is a must have addition for OPS in the central US, and handy to Chicago, St Louis and airports near the Great Lakes/Lake Michigan.

No commercial OPS located here, despite the RJ imaged above, and there are about 70-90 GA aircraft hangared here.

+++++

Ansaldo SVa5 + Luca13

download link: http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?app=downloads&showfile=14225

I know these WWI era files hold limited appeal to most folks in XP – but I love ‘em. They’re “elemental”, almost primitive affairs and more a labor of love than anything else, and Luca13′s file certainly reflects that sort of passion. From Wikipedia:

“The Ansaldo SVA (named for Savoia-Verduzio-Ansaldo) was a family of Italian reconnaissancebiplane aircraft of World War I and the decade after. Originally conceived as a fighter, the SVA was found inadequate for that role. Nevertheless, its impressive speed, range and operational ceiling, with its top speed making it one of the fastest (if not the fastest) of all Allied combat aircraft in World War I, gave it the right properties to be an excellent reconnaissance aircraft and even light bomber. Production of the aircraft continued well after the war, with the final examples delivered in 1918. Two minor variants were produced, one with reconnaissance cameras, the other without cameras but extra fuel tanks.

“The SVA was a conventionally-laid out unequal-span biplane, featuring Warren Truss-style struts, and therefore having no transverse (spanwise) bracing wires. The plywood-skinned fuselage had the typical Ansaldo triangular rear cross-section behind the cockpit, transitioning to a rectangular cross section going forwards through the rear cockpit area, with a full rectangular cross section forward of the cockpit.

“The famous Flight over Vienna propaganda flight, inspired by Gabriele d’Annunzio, was carried out on August 9, 1918, by the 87th Squadriglia La Serenissima from San Pelagio, consisting of an eleven plane flight of various models of Ansaldo SVA-series biplanes. At least two of the aircraft were two seater SVA 9 or 10s to accommodate d’Annunzio himself for the flight he inspired, with the remainder being SVA 5 single-seaters.”

Nice textures, a very workable 3D cockpit, and a docile flight model make this a real pleasure to tinker around in, and it’s recommended for a dreary winter’s eve – when such a file is sure to pick up your spirits.

Hasta later – C

Oct 01

XsimReviews : Aircraft Review – Carenado Beechcraft 58B Baron.

Carenado Beechcraft 58B Baron

Why would I want another twin?

I already have a great twin-engined aircraft from Carenado with my Piper Seneca II, and if that is too small then I have my Cessna Caravan 208B sitting in my hangar as well.

If I have one Twin Engined aircraft then another one would just sound and be very much about the same as the one I have now anyway – wouldn’t it.

That did fly through my head when Carenado announced the Beechcraft 58B Baron. In one part of me I debated that this was another Carenado product, the same company that has had my jaw dropping more than most with their incredible and minute detailing.

More so is the shear usability of the products, joyride, quick flights across any state or a small country, flying packages with the Caravan to small outflung outposts, VIP transfers and god knows what else.

I have done all and more over the last few months.

Doesn’t end there either…

Carenado is also causing me another headache. On what to choose?

It used to take only a very few moments to pick my flight for the day, but now I debate with myself on this or that of which this indecision can go on for ages till I hover my mouser over my final or second choice.

But, but , but….

The main overriding feeling though was that this new Beechcraft would be the same as all the rest…

Wrong!…   Wrong again.

The first feeling in jumping into the 58B Baron is that it felt different, the sound and feel is very different from any other X-Plane Carenado product.

It felt quieter and gentler and makes the Caravan seem brutal by comparison, as that huge propeller in the Caravan pulls you and your aircraft sideways when you turn up the power to full strength and so you have to push hard on the rudder pedals to go in the right direction as you squirm it hard down the runway until you crab yourself into the air.

The 58B Baron is nothing like that, It is smooth and powerful and you just glide into the air with a little grace.

That is not to say that the Baron is boring is because it isn’t, you enjoy it immensely.

In fact you are reveling in the sweet turns and the lightness of the touch to move it through the air. It is a lovely plane to fly.

The tight cockpit is a nice place to be as well and you will feel very much at home very quickly.

Panel lighting and detail is up to the usually high standards.

But your passenger pilot only has a few instruments (Artificial horizon & Heading) to fly with instead of the usual full instrument pack on the pilots side.

The panel is also dominated by the double Garmin Stack, one for VOR1 (top) and one for VOR2 (bottom). On top is a digital Autopilot that is also excellent to use and so is the lower Garmin transponder, I mean the quality of this equipment just blows you away…

You can move around the panel by a menu located on the side of your screen.

I am going to be brutally honest here and say I don’t like these things. Yes they are extremely handy and the Carenado version here is very well done – but I hate anything on the screen that takes me away from the experience, The discreet menus on the Caravan’s glare shield was a better way for me.

One Menu is Cameras

(you can also set this menu up on your keyboard and full instructions on how to do so are in the documents)

And it includes.

Main (pilot) view

Throttles

Fuel Select

Wing Cam L(eft)

Tail Cam

CoPilot View

Radios

View from rear

Wing Cam R(ight)

Bellycam

And the “Field of View” slider that can give you a tight or wide view of the cockpit.

The other pop-up menu is for the Options panel…

There is an opening front baggage door (Hatch?). With a lovely briefcase and all sorts of bags.

the usual Carenado window reflections are here of which you can turn off, but why would you want to?

The standard static elements, of engine covers, “Remove Before Flight” tags and bollards.

The cabin doors open wide and show the inside cabin’s incredible detail.

It is rear 4 person club seating arrangement with a pop-up table.

And every small item is covered including the warning on the windows.

luggage net (and luggage) and nothing is missing.

You can also choose from the menu the option of tinted windows or clear, I liked the tinted option as it made it more private in the cabin.

Around the aircraft you notice the excellent textures.

The modelling is first-rate.

The B58 Baron sprouts aerials like a Russian Spy Trawler and the numerous leading edge Static antennae are animated to vibrate in the airflow.

Undercarriage detail is perfectly realistic.

All animations are all first-rate, wing and engines are sublime with excellent lighting built into the wing-tips. And also not forgetting Peter and David the two pilots who were very experienced, but still showed a few annoyances at my constant picture-taking.

The aircraft is perfectly modeled with attention to detail with High Resolution, polygon-optimized modelling to the smaller details like the insides of the landing lights, the wiring inside the engine cowlings and the pitot tube.

Night lighting is excellent as well.

With great landing lights and nose-wheel lighting.

Flashing tail beacon gives just the right amount of red for realism.

One of the main features is the use of HD (High-Definition)  large (2048×2048) textures for supreme and crisp detail, which have 9 night-time textures and
5 normal map textures for extremely detailed appearance of exterior components, such as rivets, panelling, air-intakes.

And the results are simply stunning, but it is in the reflections that this aircraft is so extremely good, as you turn or catch the light the shiny reflections move with such quality, here there is a rainbow effect on the upper part of the windows.

Any reflections that you try to capture in flight are very good.


The aircraft panels highlight the light and again the incredible window reflections.

Sounds:

Sounds are also excellent, The 3d doppler effect is even better applied here than the earlier products as the low RPM sounds have their distinct sound, while the higher-RPM sounds then take over when the power is applied. This plane
also has two in-between sounds for low-mid and high-mid engine RPMs. all is recorded with high quality 44.1 KHz stereo sounds from the real plane.

Start-up splutter and turbine whine is also effective and any switch, button-lever movement is also well documented, all doors snap shut and the only thing missing here really is the pilot sneezing!

The sounds bring us to a feature that is interesting. Flying Twins successfully means managing the engines. The issue is propeller synchronisation, It isn’t noticeable on takeoff because your usually at full power, but level off and the engines are now running at different speeds.


There is a spinner or Sync-gauge that tells you that your out of engine sync, no spinning and your running correctly, but if the spinner is spinning around then you’re not in propeller sync.

The sounds are so good here that you won’t need the visual reference because as the propellers change to their different speeds it causes thrumming in the cabin, pull down on any of the mixture levers and make one engine cranky and it can give you a headache, so the feature is very well represented.

To align the engines the usual practise is to reduce the manifold pressure with the throttle levers to a better RPM using the left tachometer as a guide, when happy with the RPM, then adjust the right throttle to find the correct sync, the spinner can be help of course but your ears are a better guide, the one thing that doesn’t work is trying to sync by using the left and right tachometers as a guide as not all engines are created equally.

I also found the mixture levers very sensitive and as in my usual practise I usually pull them back for taxiing or if I require a slow landing speed (not advisable if you need a go-around), but on my first ride, I pulled the levers back as I usually do and the engines simply spluttered to a halt… Which is not the best thing to happen on a landing phase.

Another feature is the trim switch on the control column, It works in the best Carenado fashion, but you have to be careful of other actuators around it that adjust items on the panel, of which one is the start/stop switch.

Everyone thinks of the Beechcraft Baron as the Bonanza Twin, It is not as that aircraft is the model 95 Travel Air. The Baron is more of a distant cousin that an outright larger version of the popular single prop.

The original Baron (55 Short Body) first flew on the 29th February 1960, the  larger, more powerful Baron 58 (long body) was developed from the Baron 55 and introducing club seating, double aft baggage doors, and has a gross weight of 5,400lbs, in 1976, the turbocharged Baron 58TC and the pressurized Baron 58P were introduced – other versions are the G58 that was introduced in 2005 to the current day and the T-42A Cochise military version.

VNO – Max Operating Speed 195 KIAS comes from two Continental IO-550 300-hp engines for a range of 942 nmi (1,746 km, 1,085 miles) 65% power at 10,500 ft (3,200 m), 45 min reserves with a service ceiling of 19,700 ft (6,000 m).

Liveries:

The Beechcraft 58B Baron comes in five liveries:

White (default)

GoldGreen

KLM

Metal Blue

And Red Classic.

Documentation is:

Frame-rate:

I flew into my Orlando (executive) KORL airport and I have some heavy scenery running around here, most aircraft falter down to 14-16 frames but the 58B Baron still held on to a very usable 18-20 frames, in clear air 40-50 frames was normal with HDR off and no weather, with weather it averaged about 26frames.

All in all it is a very good performer with those very high HD textures.

Conclusions:

I thought it would be very hard to improve on any Carenado product, but here with the Beechcraft 58B Baron they have.

Better features, better texture quality, still even more clever detail (reflections are a stand-out), but overwhelmingly it is a very nice aircraft to fly.

It is easier to fly in some respects all throughout the taxi/Take-off/cruise/Landing phases. But with such detail you are now working on your finer points of flying in navigation, throttle (mixture) control and ATC (Air Traffic Control) that this is certainly an excellent GA Aviation simulation.

It was hard to choose a flight before the 58B Baron. But if I needed to quickly cover a hopping distance of say 200 to 500 NM then I would power up the Baron’s engines almost every time, I know it would always be a nice smooth clean ride and the Baron give you a wide smile on your face at the same time.

So I’ll just have accept the Beechcraft just so good and will push this another really great aircraft into the hanger… and with that it will cause me now even more (Carenado) decisions!

Flightime56

FT56©2012

Available From Carenado -> Carenado Beechcraft 58B Baron

Price: US$27.95

Computer System:        

- 2.66 Ghz Intel Core i5 iMac 27”

- 6 Gb 1067 Mhz DDR3

- ATI Radeon HD 4850 512mb

Software:   

- Mac OS MountainLion 10.8

- X-Plane 10 Global ver 10.10rc3

- ExtremeSceneryMAXX

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sep 28

x+sim+reviews + 28 September 2012


Go draw up some coffee and find a comfy chair because we’ve got a long post today, and a lot of significant ground to cover along the way. First file we’ll cover is frede’s latest, KIAH | Houston Intercontinental, then we’ll take a quick look at the new Carenado Baron as well as the SSG E170, and we’ll close out with Santiago Butnaru’s latest payware airport project. First, some unrelated news.

Kevin Grimm, as most of you are by now well aware, has taken to modifying existing airport files for his own use, and he’s been sending along images of his most recent efforts – but more as a guide to what’s possible in XP if you’ll get out your trusty/dusty old copy of Photoshop and start having a go at tweaking objects and textures at a few of your favorite airport files. Kevin recently turned his attention to Drawbridge Designs’ new KILM + Wilmington, NC, and his efforts are instructive of what can be accomplished with tweaks on even the very best files.

Today we’re going to focus on just one area Kevin has been working on…a huge patch of grass!

Enlarge the image below and focus on the river, and the shading therein. Does that water appear to have depth to you?

We’ve carried on enough over the years about “visual chaos” to have bored you to tears, but this is kinda-sorta what we mean by the term, if’n you know what I mean! Located near the intersection of crossing runways, this construction site is highly visible day or night, and by using judicious scaling as well as shadow and light Kevin has tricked the eye into seeing this patch as an excavation site – maybe a few feet deep? – even though XP doesn’t allow negative excavations.

The effect is enhanced at night with careful placement of lighting…just enough to give depth yet not so much to overwhelm performance. Add a few blinking lights and an animated truck and you have the recipe for a completely plausible construction site that’s sure to distract the heck out of you – which is the point of adding such enhancements in the first place.

As we’ve harped on and on before, it’s these distractions that increase the immersive nature of a scenery file while at the same time improving a file’s utility as a training tool. Good pilots need to know how to handle distractions, how to prioritize conflicting demands for their attention. Exercises in scenery design such as this may simply “look cool” on one level, but it’s exactly this kind of immersive detail that will set excellent scenery files apart from the merely good files.

We’ll have the full story on Kevin’s modified KILM soon. What he’s done is simply without precedent in XP, and in an ideal world developers would pay very close attention indeed to what he’s accomplishing here. Perhaps in this ideal world Drawbridge and Kevin would come together and figure out a way to incorporate these types of changes?

+++++

Look for a major update to the STMA DHC-3 Otter this weekend. Literally dozens of improvements are aimed at improving performance and features in v10 (there’s a four page PDF listing these changes!), but you’ll find better panel textures and lighting the main reason for getting this update onboard.

+++++

frede released a new airport last night, and after looking it over both FlightTime56 and I agreed: time for another X-Award!

The size and scope of this effort simply overwhelms the senses (let alone anything he’s done before), yet we both noted something quite extraordinary when we opened this file: it’s tiny in terms of resource allocation and framerates are simply not an issue here with HDR off. I’m talking less than 200Mb total scenery load with airport detail at extreme and AA at 16x (again, no HDR), and even setting HDR up to 4xAA still had little perceptible impact on my machine – though using less demanding ACF. This is a WED airport and you’ll find building elements from the default KSEA and even parking structures from LOWI mixed in to create something really quite extraordinary. Don’t believe it? Click the image below, a 35 inch wide monster, then scroll around for a close look.

There’s ramp detail every where you look, and with HDR lighting active these acres and acres of tarmac come alive. Let’s take a gander at the real facility now.

This airport now anchors the western terminus of frede’s tether – stretching from Houston, Texas to Destin, Florida, but KIAH isn’t a little hick-town outpost by any stretch of the imagination. Houston is the de facto epicenter of global oil exploration and production, and this airport reflects that status:

Aeroméxico Mexico City D
Aeroméxico Connect Mexico City, Monterrey D
Air Canada Express Jazz Air Calgary, Toronto-Pearson A
Air France Paris-Charles de Gaulle D
Alaska Airlines Seattle/Tacoma A
American Airlines Dallas/Fort Worth, Miami A
American Eagle Chicago-O’Hare, Los Angeles A
British Airways London-Heathrow D
Delta Air Lines AtlantaDetroit, Minneapolis/St. Paul A
Delta Connection Comair Cincinnati, Minneapolis/St. Paul [all services end September 29, 2012] A
Delta Connection Compass Airlines Detroit, Minneapolis/St. Paul, New York-LaGuardia, Salt Lake City A
Delta Connection ExpressJet Airlines Atlanta, Cincinnati, Detroit, Memphis A
Delta Connection Pinnacle Airlines Atlanta, Cincinnati [begins September 30, 2012], Detroit, Memphis, Minneapolis/St. Paul A
Delta Connection SkyWest Airlines Detroit, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Salt Lake City A
Delta Connection Shuttle America New York-LaGuardia A
Emirates Dubai D
Frontier Airline Republic Airlines Denver A
KLM Amsterdam D
Lufthansa Frankfurt D
Qatar Airways Doha D
Singapore Airlines Moscow-Domodedovo, Singapore D
Spirit Airlines Chicago-O’Hare [begins October 4, 2012][43], Dallas/Fort Worth, Las Vegas [begins October 4, 2012][44] A
Sun Air International Victoria (TX) [begins October 1, 2012][45] A
TACA San SalvadorRoatán D
Turkish Airlines Istanbul-Atatürk [begins April 1, 2013][46] D
United Airlines Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Boston, Calgary, Charlotte, Chicago-O’Hare, Cleveland, Columbus (OH), Dallas/Fort Worth, Denver, Detroit, Edmonton, El Paso,Fort Lauderdale, Fort Myers, Honolulu, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Miami, Minneapolis/St. Paul, New Orleans, New York-LaGuardia,Newark, Oklahoma City [resumes October 7, 2012], Omaha, Ontario, Orange County (CA), Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Portland (OR),Raleigh/Durham, Reno/Tahoe, Sacramento, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose (CA), San Juan, Seattle/Tacoma, Tampa,Tulsa, Vancouver, Washington-Dulles, Washington-National, West Palm Beach
Anchorage, Eagle/Vail, Gunnison/Crested Butte, Hayden/Steamboat Springs, Jackson Hole, Montrose, Tucson
C, E
United Airlines Acapulco, Amsterdam, Aruba [ends January 19, 2013], Belize City, Bogotá, Bonaire, Buenos Aires-Ezeiza, Cancún, Caracas, Cozumel, Frankfurt, Grand Cayman, Guadalajara, Guatemala City, Lagos, León/Del Bajío, Liberia, Lima, London-Heathrow, Managua, Mazatlán [ends December 1, 2012], Mérida,Mexico City, Montego Bay, Monterrey, Panama City, Paris-Charles de Gaulle [ends October 8, 2012],[47] Port of Spain, Puerto Vallarta, Quito, Rio de Janeiro-Galeão, Roatán, San José de Costa Rica, San José del Cabo, San Pedro Sula, San Salvador, São Paulo-Guarulhos, Tegucigalpa, Tokyo-Narita
Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Nassau
E
United Express Chautauqua Airlines Atlanta, Baton Rouge, Columbus (OH), Dallas/Fort Worth, Louisville, Oklahoma City, St. Louis A,B
United Express ExpressJet Airlines Aguascalientes, Albuquerque, Alexandria, Amarillo, Atlanta, Austin, Baton Rouge, Birmingham (AL), Brownsville, College Station, Cedar Rapids, Charleston (SC), Charleston (WV), Charlotte, Chihuahua, Cincinnati, Ciudad del Carmen, Colorado Springs, Columbia (SC), Columbus (OH), Corpus Christi, Dallas-Love, Dallas/Fort Worth, Dayton, Del Rio, Denver, Detroit, Durango, El Paso, Fayetteville (AR), Fort Walton Beach, Grand Junction, Grand Rapids,Greenville/Spartanburg, Guadalajara, Gulfport/Biloxi, Harlingen, Hobbs, Huatulco, Huntsville, Indianapolis, Ixtapa/Zihuatanejo, Jackson (MS), Jacksonville,Kansas City, Killeen/Fort Hood, Knoxville, Lafayette, Laredo, León/Del Bajío, Lexington, Little Rock, Louisville, Lubbock, Manzanillo, Mazatlán, McAllen,Memphis, Mexico City, Midland-Odessa, Milwaukee, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Mobile, Monroe, Monterrey, Morelia, Nashville, New Orleans, Oaxaca, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Pensacola, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Puebla, Querétaro, Raleigh/Durham, Richmond, Salt Lake City, Saltillo, San Antonio, San José del Cabo, San Luis Potosí, Savannah, Shreveport, St. Louis, Tampico, Toronto-Pearson, Torreón/Gómez Palacio, Tucson, Tulsa, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Tyler, Veracruz,Villahermosa, Washington-Dulles, West Palm Beach, Wichita
Acapulco, Fort Myers, Montrose, Nassau, Norfolk, Rapid City, St. Louis
B
United Express Shuttle America AlbuquerqueMontréal-Trudeau C
United Express SkyWest Airlines Albuquerque, Atlanta, Austin, Bakersfield, Cedar Rapids, Charleston (SC), Charlotte, Cincinnati, Colorado Springs, Columbus (OH), Dallas-Love, Dallas/Fort Worth, Denver, Des Moines, Detroit, El Paso, Fayetteville (AR), Fort Myers, Indianapolis, Kansas City, Little Rock, Midland-Odessa, Milwaukee,Minneapolis/St. Paul, Oklahoma City, Omaha, Pittsburgh, Raleigh/Durham, Salt Lake City, Toronto-Pearson, Tucson, Washington-Dulles, Wichita
Aspen, Norfolk, Palm Springs, St. Louis
B, C
United Expressoperated byTrans States Airlines Cincinnati, Greenville/Spartanburg, Memphis, Nashville, Oklahoma City
St. Louis
C
US Airways Charlotte, Philadelphia, Phoenix A
VivaAerobus Monterrey D

Note concourse data above and place on the chart below to get oriented:

We’re in v10.10rc3 and it looks like WED library elements have been tweaked a bit too. Note the metallic sheen to the control tower?

Images here are with HDR OFF, and with 5 AI aircraft in play framerates were buttery smooth.

Ancillary support hangars abound, and you’ll find air cargo, biz jet, and GA facilities included.

Now let’s turn on HDR (at ax/4xAA) and continue looking around (and click to enlarge):

Oh, that new Delta Boeing 717-200 paint is available here.

You’ll find frede’s latest KIAH for v10 at his download page, located here.

This is a truly exceptional file, well suited to regional OPS around Texas and the southern US, as well as a broad array of international destinations. Yes, it’s a must have file, the best effort yet by one of the very best scenery developers working in X-Plane. Don’t miss this one.

+++++

After flying the new Carenado B58 Baron for about five hours I’m convinced this file should be the first ACF we paste an X-Award for Excellence on. While not 100% v10 compliant (I noted oil pressure and Amp gauge issues common to many ACF in v10), after this brief time it’s simply a matter of common sense: this is now the best GA aircraft in X-Plane. Period. I could prattle on about this or that feature, but suffice to say that everything you’ve ever wanted in a GA twin is in here (though I’d have loved that radar altimeter from the F33A), and because this ACF is textured at very high resolution the look of the file is simply breathtaking.

Framerates?

Well, like the man said – “If you gotta ask…” Don’t bother if you have less than 512mb vram on your video card, and you’d better be running a mean machine to work with HDR active and ground detail dialed up. If you do? Holy guacamole!

I’ve a few hours TT in a 56TC Baron (close enough for government work) and about all you really need to improve the immersive experience of this file is a three year old in back screaming her head off from that ear ache she got last night.

The panel? Sheesh. The lighting posts are awol, and with lighting now under the glare shield that’s the biggest change seen from earlier ACF, and while this lighting scheme reflects later builds it works well despite very few adjustment options. Other than that…I felt right at home in here. Oh, the 3D sound file is quite nice. With good headphones it’ll drill the fillings right out of your mouth.

Four basic liveries included, the KLM being a real aircraft and not a flight of fancy. Both KLM and Lufthansa have operated flight training facilities in Arizona from time to time, just FYI. The other paints are decent enough, too.

So… You want Carenado Class exterior detailing?  Well… You got it. When you can make out the strobe tubes in the wingtips? Sheesh. You got detail, alright.

And watching the animated tray/table in the aft cabin is kinda fun too. Lot’s of view and cabin options via the popups located left side of the panel.

And again…this panel is peerless…a real work of art.

My only gripe? The cowl flap handles/knobs are a bit too dark and get lost down there!

Operations? After several flights around KMIA as well as a hop from MYEM| Governor’s Island, Bahamas to KMIA to test autopilot OPS, and shooting a coupled ILS approach on 26L, I noted that everything works about as well as can be expected (aside from the items noted above). If you’ve been using other Carenado files, OPS will feel quite intuitive.

Still, what impressed me most was how well all these disparate elements come together in this file. It’s a visually compelling file of course, but operations are polished. smooth, and a joy to use. Manipulators are precise, you want to do something on the panel and it works like you’d want it to…so the ACF doesn’t fight you…it works with you to do what you want or need – when you need it – and we just haven’t had many ACF in XP built to this level…yet.

Here’s hoping that this is the first of a long parade of mega-hits for Carenado. Congrats to Dan and the team. This is a transformative ACF for X-Plane, one of the very best files we have now. Don’t miss it.

Get it here: http://www.carenado.com/CarSite/Portal/index.php?accion=product&correl=76

Price: 27.95USD

+++++

Concerning the new SSG E170, after a lot of head scratching over this one I’m still convinced it’s a worthy file and a great new RJ, yet there’ve been a lot of comments about design inadequacies that I feel are worth addressing in any kind of brief review. Still, almost all of the kinds of deficiencies so noted have very little impact on OPS and reflect a concern for an attention to detail that developers in X-Plane have rarely aimed for, let alone achieved.

As we’ve noted in our own comments over the past week or so, this is changing. As users from FsX drop by to check out X-Plane they are bringing a more discerning eye to bear on every aspect of X-Plane, and increasing the level of expectations that developers will have to meet. Failing to meet said expectations will be a good way to ensure XP’s eventual undoing, but let’s not dwell on these thoughts right now.

Most issues noted center around several items deficient in the basic modeling of the ACF: the hull’s prismatic sections (when viewed from head on) are a little too round/not quite oval enough (see the cross section below); the inboard flaps should be slotted Fowler flaps (and yes, depending on how much XP takes this into account this could indeed be a real factor when modeling low speed behavior of the flight model); the winglets appear to be too tall, and the main gears retract too far into the wheel wells. Some comments disparage the shape of the nose/windscreen area.

My only beef in all this? Some autopilot OPS are apparently hard to figure out for some (myself included), and the manual isn’t a big help. EADT got around this by making a very detailed step-by-step tutorial (if you want to do X, move Y lever to make X happen), and I think the SSG Group could make a few friends by taking a similar approach. Make an illustrated “practice” flight, and begin with downloading an FSM flight plan and setting up a real flight from beginning to end, detailing which buttons and switches need to be used to do X,Y or Z, and why. The current manual is a little thin for informing less experienced users, and there are enough dissimilarities in this file’s OPS profile from the default FMC to make some basic operations quite confusing. Enough said?

Below, the initial offering of liveries available is of high quality but a little thin on choice. There are about a dozen more real world operators missing with this release and hopefully we’ll see more of these appearing soon.

That said, the liveries are uniformly excellent, and global coverage is ensured even with this limited selection, but I’m sure many would love to see BA, Air France, Estonian, JAL and USAir added soon.

Looking over details on this exterior I’m really quite impressed, but then again I don’t have FsX and so my expectations have been honed by years of using X-Plane. Still, to my eye what I see looks very good indeed, and for a team that’s made just one freeware 748 and moved on to this endeavor I’d say it’s a damn fine effort. Beyond that, it’s fun to fly and I’ve been doing that all week long and as often as possible, and every time I fly it I simply grow more impressed with what’s been accomplished by this group.

Concerning the panel? It gets the job done, and there are some neat features in the FMC, but it’s not PMDG quality – visually. Then again, a PMDG file cost almost three times what this file does, doesn’t it?

But once again, here’s the real deal. For X-Plane developers to compete in a market dominated by PMDG-levels of expectations, they’re going to have to get serious about modeling their panels. When you look at a photo of a real aircraft’s panel you’re going to have to make your model look about 99% as good as that photograph if you want your ACF to sell to a broad audience. Ramzzess and Phillip just ran into that wall with their T7, and it’s an issue that’s not going away.

Still, looking at the issues at hand there’s absolutely nothing wrong visually with this panel in terms of operational flexibility. There is one gripe I’d have to share and it concerns manipulators. Many manipulator zones are agonizingly small and hard to use, especially at an oblique angle, and those on the glareshield are the main culprits. Some of the text up there could be sharper, too.

Here’s Dan Klaue’s payware ERJ-140 (below), and included just for comparison’s sake. This is an older file though comparably priced, yet modeling is sharper, lighting controls more comprehensive, and pax cabin and doorways are modeled. The manual is more detailed, and OPS for less experienced users should be easier to grasp as a result.

In the end, I feel this v1.0 effort by SSG is a worthy purchase and for a couple of reasons, chief among them that the community supports a new development team laying it all out there. Second, the aircraft file is indeed immersive and very fun to fly, and on this both FlightTime56 and I concur. The file represents good value for money, and models a new series of aircraft not found in XP.

We still rate this a must have file despite reservations expressed by others in the community, but we simply have to state that if you’re expecting PMDG levels of panel detail you’ll more than likely find the file comes up short – for you. Perhaps if you try it you’ll come to appreciate it’s many strengths?

Me? I’ll be using the SSG E170 often, and loving every minute of it. I’ll be looking forward to updates to the manual as much as to the ACF, and we’ll report on progress as we learn more.

The file is at the OrgStore: http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/x-planestore/Detail?no=401

Price: 24.95 USD

+++++

SKSP | San Andres Island, Colombia + Santiago Butnaru

download link: http://store01.prostores.com/servlet/x-planestore/Detail?no=402

price: 12.95 USD

This effort represents a lot more than a simple airport file – as most of the island’s principal town is modeled, and often down to surprising detail (cobblestone streets, anyone?). Water detail is simply a cut above what we normally see in XP too, and yes, these Caribbean blues are eye-catching, but real. Fly into any number of airports in the region and the first thing that grabs you on final is the water. You can easily see the sea floor – up to 200 feet beneath the sea surface – and shallower waters are indeed the vibrant blues seen here. Well done, Santiago!

A good theoretical destination from KIAH | Houston, you’ll find that real world OPS are primarily centered on Central and South American airports:

Air Transat Montréal-Trudeau
Avianca Bogotá
Copa Airlines Colombia Barranquilla, Bogotá, Cali, Cartagena, Medellín-Córdova, Panama City
LAN Colombia Bogotá
Satena Providencia
TACA Airlines / Lacsa San José de Costa Rica
Searca Providencia

The village economy is centered on tourism (bargain shopping a big draw) and fishing. Again, you’ll find the village of San Andres is nicely modeled.

Airport lighting is available for v9 or v10, and the necessary files for v10 GI compliant lighting will be found in a separate folder. Oh, here’s the real facility:

Santiago’s model closely approximates what’s on the ground. Vibrant colors? You got it!

The airport is capable of handling some serious aircraft (runway 06/24, 7800 ft/ 2380m); bad weather is an equally serious factor in this part of the world, and was responsible for a 737/7 going down/undershooting in 2010 while attempting a landing here in rough weather; wind shear/pilot error was the suspected factor.

All in all, I’ve made a few passes around the area in a couple of ACF and the overall effort looks quite good. Many of the textures and colors used here are quite bright yet reflect what’s down there on the ground. Detailing and clarity is not quite up to WED lego brick levels, but that’s often the case with custom made objects like these.

We’d say if Caribbean and or Central American OPS are on your agenda then this is a file that will appeal to you. It’s a nice change of pace, and an affordable purchase, if you just want to try it out.

And that’s about all for now. We’ll see you soon. C

Sep 25

XsimReview : Aircraft Review – Supercritical Simulations Group Embraer 170LR E-Jet

SSG (Supercritical Simulations Group) are one of the new kids on the block, It is a brave team to start-up today and start putting out products because the quality is now getting very good for payware aircraft. but here with this E-jet many people have decided that there is a market for their talents and so the SSG team have gone from strength to strength.

The Team consists of:

Ricardo Bolognini Project leader and primary 3D modeling, flight dynamics
and system programming

Stefan Keller Reference guide development and technical advisor
Carlos Garcia Director of testing and marketing
George Garrido Textures and repaints
Baber Sikander Additional 3D modeling and textures
Tim Gleason Technical advisor and product testing

Their first product was a freeware Boeing 748i and Freighter, It was that the modelling was excellent but lacked a really decent 3d cockpit, but it was freeware.

The thing that stood out on the B748i/F was the great reflections of the aircraft, and in any good light it looked supreme and simply gorgeous.

But the real objective of the team was this Embraer 170LR or E-jet, which is a great regional jet that competes with the bombardier CRJ-200 and the faster turbo-props like the Dash8 and the ATR 72-600.

It seats 80 passengers and has a range of just over 2000NM (2100NM)

First flown on February 19, 2002, the E-170 series is a relatively new modern era aircraft and is built by Embraer S.A. in Brazil.

Continue reading

Sep 15

XsimReviews : 15th Sept 2012 : Update RC10.10rc2 : WSSS Singapore : Boeing 377 Stratocruiser.

First let’s us get to the news…

Update 10.10rc2 is out – so roll the installers.

size is 123mb, so that is a fairly sizeable update.

The highlights are mostly fixed on the Windows ATI drivers, It doesn’t fix all of the issues but at least there has been some attention to the matter.

There seems to be a lot of bugs coming out of older aircraft including the “default” machines and here again we have had a lot more quashing, this time around concerning the electrical systems, as Ben (Supnik) notes :

“If you have already saved your airplane with Plane-Maker 10.10, you may have to re-enter some of the amperages and bus choices for your electrical system – the amount of data scrambling depends on how you used Plane-Maker.  The good news is that the damage is limited to the second electrical page so at the very worst, you’ll have to re-enter some electrical system data using rc2.”

round and around we all go…

The joystick box has had a few adjustments as for one if you Change the Axis assignments in the Joystick dialog, it no longer throws away calibration data.

The set up is slightly different as well… now you get the red bars until X-Plane10 is happy and it has all the joystick co-ordinates, then and only then do you go green. (A feature on XP9?)

If you still have a red bar then that means you have a problem and you will need your joystick fixing to fly properly

Related to RC2 is an article by Chris Serio on the Dev blog – slow-open-dialogs-if-youre-a-hoarder

It seems that now X-Plane10 will scan your Aircraft folders and update them while X-Plane10 is running, which is a great feature, however if you have a lot of folders (The point of Chris’s article) then every time you want to select a new aircraft then X-Plane will check in every folder to see what it has on offer for you.

If you change aircraft frequently then you will find this process slows down the selection, before this process was hidden when you started up. Chris notes to use a “dont_search_here.txt” to speed up the compiling.

This feature however doesn’t work for custom scenery…….  “booo hisss” but only for Aircraft.

While we are on the subject of choosing aircraft I will mention if you missed “upkeep’s” little tip of that if you want to change your livery and not send your aircraft back to its starting point (runway), or in my case the “aggghhhh I hate that!” point, then just press “ESCAPE” and you will find it will just only change the livery and still keep you in the air and at the same place that you left it…..  Thanks upkeep.

The roads have again come in for more attention with more art assets, and better templates – I’ll have keep an eye out of the cockpit for that one.

So the details of 10.10rc2:

X-Plane 10.10 RC 2

  • Updated road art assets. The updated art assets contain more details and more templates for better road grids.
  • “Open” dialogs now faster for users who had a “Custom Scenery (disabled)” folder. Read more here.
  • Joystick axis now appear red in the dialog if they’re uncalibrated or unassigned. Red means the axis is not going to work properly so fix it!
  • Slightly improved Joystick calibration wizard.
  • Runway and taxiway lights improved to be visible at various angles in a more realistic manner. NOTE: Taxiway lights SHOULD be difficult to see in many airborne situations. This is NOT a bug. This is how the real lights work.

Aircraft:

  • Electrical system fixed on F-22, F-4, Baron, Kingair, and Piaggio.
  • Fuselage shadow fixed on C172.

ATI Windows Drivers:

  • This build works around sRGB problems in HDR mode and turns off sRGB for non-HDR mode.
  • I am a member of the ATI driver beta program, and have tried newer drivers that fixes the sRGB problem for non-HDR mode. 10.10r2 is programmed to recognize these newer drivers and turn sRGB back on.

What this means to you:

  • HDR mode will look good for ATI Windows drivers. Forward rendering will look okay but the night scene will be overly bright and a bit ‘wet’ looking in the far-ground.
  • When the next revision of ATI drivers comes out, things should just start working.

I haven’t been able to reproduce the bug where clouds appear as crazy triangles; if you have this, please get latest drivers, re-test against rc2, and re-file a bug report so we can get more information.
Bug Fixes

  • Fixed complete anarchy in the electrical system file-io code. Believe it or not, this fixes the roll in the 747 and other airplanes! Authors using 10.10, check the electrical system pages in Plane-Maker carefully in 10.10r2! See more here!
  • Fixed import of v9 airplanes made on a PPC mac into v10.
  • Fixed unclickable P-180 cockpit panel.
  • Runway lights are visible when off-axis, e.g. on base.
  • Fixed shadows disappearing in flight when set to “3-d on cockpit” for the P-180 and other planes.
  • Fixed disappearing spill lights (when made by an OBJ and attached to an airplane).
  • Fixed black boxes around LIGHT_CUSTOM lights in HDR mode.
  • Electrical systems such as the Hydraulic, Vacuum and Gyro systems no longer “overspeed” when the bus voltage is over nominal (ie. a charging bus).
  • Changing Axis assignments in the Joystick dialog, no longer throw away calibration data.
  • EGT fixed to be scaled properly based on the appropriate N1 or N2 speeds.
  • Command-line framerate test fixed
  • We have disabled the wing import function in Plane-Maker – it can crash Plane-Maker (causing you to lose your work). We may put it back in a future update if enough users want it. As a work-around, you can copy wings with a text editor in X-Plane 10.
  • Fixed ATTR_diffuse_rgb when used with global shadows.
  • Fixed pre-fill optimization on NV Mac drivers.
  • Fixed pre-fill for non-shadow objects.
  • Fixed spill lighting on runway lights.
  • Fixed anti-ice system failure labels in Plane-Maker.

__________________________________

WSSS – Singapore Changi Int 1.1 – Kris28 : WSSS – Singapore Changi Int 1.1

I wanted to bring up again WSSS – Singapore Changi Int by Kris28 because it is an interesting piece of scenery.

Kris28 has done an exceptional job of this Airport, as you know I am not the biggest fan of the facade building block system, but Kris28 proves that with a little talent you can get around its many limitations.

For me WSSS is a major link in my flying world, most long haul is East – West or the going the other way, and as I live in Australia the famous Kangaroo Route (Australia – Singapore – (Bahrain) – London is my mainstay of routing, out and back I have to run through either WSSS (SIN) or HKG (Hong Kong).

The worry is that so little Asian scenery is available, “Ted’s” version is of course very old but it was workable in the overall scheme of things and was always a welcome sight after 7 – 12 hours and after using up huge amounts of Aviation Jet A-1.

The route was created by British Airways (Imperial Airways) and Qantas, however with Qantas’s new deal with Emirates, they will from next year route through Dubai and end a service that has operated since 1935, still 20 airlines operate the route and with Qantas’s withdrawal British Airways with Singapore Airlines will now have the most of the yield to share between them.

I love Changi, I call it a “huge Shopping Centre with aircraft and not cars parked outside” because basically that is what it is – “A Shopping Hub”.

Kris28 is some ways is lucky because Changi looks like a shopping mall from the outside, so the facade buildings will work out here very well, he was smart enough to not do all the terminals in just one bland facade…

…. but to mix them up and it worked out extremely well.

And the full arrangement is very good.

Ramps are also well set out.

A great mixture of ramp detail is very evident.

any view is very similar to the airport itself and it is very well laid out.

The Singapore Airlines Engineering base is very good, but with no Singapore Aircraft in attendance?

This brings me to a tip: When creating Very Large Hubs, it is best to do some research, first find out where the various areas are and place the aircraft which are appropriate to that place.

Most airlines are surprisingly grouped together at certain terminals, so to have a few together set out in one area is not being out of character, look for the Airline alliances like “Star Alliance” or “One World” and group those airlines that are related to that alliance.

Hubs like Singapore are usually dominated by their flag carriers, Here there should be set rows of “Singapore Airlines” fleet aircraft,,,, (ever been to Narita?)

The Cargo terminal is very good and is well laid out as well.

“How many?” trucks… It does feel just slightly too low, maybe an extra floor?

As more and more art is added to the library it is now giving a more visual difference to the whole concept, the only one I don’t like is the original facade.

Here it is on show at the Domestic Terminal, I think the issue is the windows don’t have any depth and have always looked look cartoony and flat – certainly when you get close.

If you look at the first picture of this series you will see it is empty in the central area, however zoom in closer and the trees will then fill in the gap, then it looks really great, but from a distance it looks only average.

I tried many different settings to try to keep this area filled but I couldn’t get it to work at all, annoying? – yes very.

When in there the trees looked great, but I wish Kris28 had put a fence between the trees (Road) as it didn’t look right and the area was so open. (hey Mr Terrorist!)

Another wish was that the OSM traffic also went down the centre section as well, it would have been perfect and would have added some very good animation to the scene.

At night this area was (spooky) lit up, and was very empty.

Lighting has improved through Ben’s tinkering.

The lighting effects on this airport are amazingly good, Kris28 has been smart to use the lighting to highlight the different areas, overall it is excellent.

Only worry is that does the brighter airport lighting effects overwhelm the runway lighting?

With the OSM in the distance it is very effective visually.

If you have the Singapore Singapore scenery in there then it helps out the scene, but it does need some far more medium height buildings (lit) to make it more realistic.

But effective the lighting is, on the ramp you would be pushed to tell the difference from a real picture.

The lighting reflections are so good, and the difference is that the lights are not overwhelming the picture in being too bright.

Frame-rates were not too bad either, I think a similar sized airport would have pushed my rates right down, but the lighting is powerful stuff and it takes a few candles to run.

So WSSS Changi is a great file to have and a great addition for my routing, It is also one to study as well if you want to do some serious WED gardening!

But more overall I would like to see more Asian Scenery coming through the box, Beijing, Shanghai and Seoul plus another 20 or so, are very badly needed, there are a few FS versions out there, but they all are pretty average.

__________________________________

To finish off we will go back in time… to the 50′s

Boeing B-377 Stratocruiser 1.1 – ScifiX : B-377 Stratocruiser

I loved these old birds, but when you think back you would have been mad to cross the Atlantic in one, as ScifiX notes “they had chronic problems with the four 28-cylinder Pratt & Whitney Wasp Major radial engines and their associated four-blade propellers, and only 56 were built for airlines.”

“Gulp”…

Still they were great things, It was developed from the C-97 Stratofreighter, a military derivative of the B-29 Superfortress used for troop transport and the Stratocruiser’s first flight was on July 8, 1947.

It was a double-decker as mainly it took so long to get there (or anywhere) you needed somewhere to sleep.

But this is a lovely file, I feel it is not yet completed as there is no undercarriage doors and the inner engines are not yet textured.

And there are some details still to be smoothed over..

But there is still some great detail, like the aerial wires and it also has a fairly decent 3d cockpit.

The centre console is here as well.

Plus the now consigned to history Nav/Engineering Station.

With a Map!

Don’t you miss those brilliant logos, beautiful….

Two liveries here with a PanAm and Northwest with a default grey aircraft, this is a fun ship to (noisily) power around in, Handing is very good with it being bulky and slow, 300knts and your going flat-out (earplugs in) but there something great about going a fair-distance in this, for one you see the ground most of the way and for realism turn up the “Equipment Failures” to blow up an engine…

I loved it in a sentimental way….

Thanks for passing by – enjoy the weekend Flightime56

FT56©2012

Post note: notice all the “marginal” ferries and ships.. simply great.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sep 11

x+sim+reviews + 9 September 2012

Two significant new files to walk through today, but we’ll try to keep it short and to the point anyway (hard for us, we know), but first up, some news:

  •  Hawker Beechcraft says it is close to signing an agreement to be acquired by Superior Aviation Beijing. Chairman Bill Boisture said the purchase agreement for $1.79 billion “is going to happen in the next few days.” However, the agreement does not prevent bankruptcy court from holding a public auction for Hawker Beechcraft. FlightGlobal.com (U.K.)
  • Users of Pilot Country Airport in Florida are concerned about a gun range proposed for land next door to the airport. “We approach directly overhead,” said pilot and resident Mark Budd. “It’s just too close. Who ever thought of putting a gun range right next door to an airport?” However, John Collins, the manager of airport policy for the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association, said several airports have gun ranges located nearby. WTVT-TV (Tampa, Fla.)
  • Bombardier has completed a test of aircraft systems by powering on the Learjet 75 business jet. Bombardier says the superlight jet is on schedule to enter service in 2013. The Learjet 75 includes a new flight deck, which Bombardier said requires “major changes to the aircraft’s wiring harness.” FlightGlobal.com (U.K.)
  • Britain’s Prince Harry, 27, is beginning a combat tour flying as a co-pilot and gunner on Apache attack helicopters in Afghanistan. “Prince Harry, like any soldier, considers it a great honor to represent his country in her majesty’s armed forces wherever it chooses to deploy him,” St James’s Palace said in a statement. San Jose Mercury News (Calif.)/The Associated Press
  • Learning how to manage risks, mitigate in-flight emergencies, prepare for an emergency landing, and exit the aircraft safely can mean the difference between life and death. That’s why AOPA is devoting a track of safety seminars at AOPA Aviation Summit to emergency survival and risk management. AOPA Online

I fumbled across another lightning shot last night, made near ENGM and while futzing about with one of Samen’s new Airbus files in heavy weather. Seems to me the lightning should originate INSIDE the bright spot on the cloud, and no matter how you change perspective the lightning bolt remains on the topmost layer of the image (so even though it looks like it’s behind – or further away from the aircraft, if you change POV the lightning remains in front of the aircraft, i.e., with the aircraft behind the bolt). Still, fun imagery.

Below, a look at New Orleans with stock (or default) XP10.10r1 objects. There is now, or so it seems, a bigger variety of multi-level structures on the ground in this latest release, like apartment buildings and low-rise office buildings.

And you can see the net results of this increased variety here again in SanDiego (below), with that looks like a bigger variety of multi-level structures lending a more realistic air about the landscape. And then there’s that PBY…

Updated: Consolidated PBY Catalina + Hydroz

purchase link

The number of improvements in this file is huge with this version 1.3 UPDATE, but it’s the type (and quality) of work that’s going to get your attention, and I’d say that with this version Hydroz’s PBY has entered the big leagues. This is a fun file, and even if not into seaplanes you’ll probably enjoy using this one.

Here’s the change log, direct from the developer:

Now, you have a copilot !

  • He manage RPM and mixture setting, depending of flight configuration and power setting
  • He manage cowl flap and carburetor heat system
  • He inform you of various systems status (Landing gear, water-tank, probe, etc…)

New 2D pop-up panels (Artwork by Khamsin Studio)

  • Switches panel
  • Check-list (Normal and Emergency)
  • Point of view

Hydraulic system now simulated

  • Engine hydraulic pump and emergency hydraulic pump feeding 2 accumulators
  • Various system impacted : probe, water jettison, gear actuating and brakes
  • Various failure (pump fail, leak, engine fail, …)
  • Easy mode with no hydraulic failure

Various improvements

  • Option settings are now saved at plane unloading (X-Plane quit or aircraft change)
  • Water rudder only effective below 30kts when easy mode selected
  • Visual alert can be disabled in Copilot setting menu
  • Alert now disappear after 3 seconds, even if problem is not solved
  • Master volume option to set volume of SASL driven sounds
  • Archive size reduced from 324Mo to 217Mo

Bug fix :

  • No more sound resonance while both engines are at same RPM
  • Right engine fuel consumption corrected in “Auto-lean” mode
  • Correct fuel tank settings when starting with engine running
  • Menus are no longer affected by ambient light levels
The “EASY” mode takes all the guesswork out of this file, and with a co-pilot along for the ride adjusting engine parameters, it’s simply hard to mess things up anymore! Panel lighting has been improved in a recent update, and night OPS are more feasible now.
If you’ve not purchased before, please note that a large part of the proceeds of this sale go to maintaining the original aircraft, which is modeled and included in this collection. And yes, I say collection as there are several different ACF included, and the documentation included will get you up to speed in a hurry. Note: you can get lost wandering around the cabins inside this ACF.
It’s a fun file, and a “Must Have” most highly recommended one as well.
Now it’s just wickedly easy to fly!

+++++

KNBG | NAS/JRB New Orleans + frede

download link

Filling in his New Orleans area airports, frede released NAS New Orleans today, and this is another über-sweet effort that fits in well with his existing Lakefront and Louis Armstrong International airport packages. Despite fears the load on XP imposed by three hyper-detailed airports in such close proximity would prove troublesome, I was able to get a quite nice level of performance out of this grouping by keeping HDR OFF until I was on the ground and poking around the file taking screenshots.

The facility looks quite small approaching from the air, and it’s definitely smaller than Pensacola or Eglin–yet still a nice size for fighter and C17 OPS. There’s a fair amount of Navy AND Air Force activity at this base, too, with F/A18s and F15s based here, as well as a US Coast Guard facility…and of course frede has modeled it all!

In the Google imagery above (click to enlarge) you can get oriented to New Orleans as well as the Gulf Coast region, and this base was sited to protect vital offshore shipping routes during WWII, and remains important today in the same role, as well as keeping an eye on offshore oil platforms and running anti-drug smuggling/interdiction OPS.

The L-shaped airport allows for easy manipulation of “depth” with careful use of building and lighting placement, and frede comes through again with a very special facility.

Again, below and even from a higher angle of view, the sense of depth is complete.

And massive object placements contribute to this sense of space and depth whilst on the ground.

You’ll find more images in our XP Screenshots section up above, and all we can say for now is this is a v1.0 effort and I’m not sure what remains to be done as the file looks quite complete as is! Of course it’s a “Must Have” – most highly recommended download, and  for v10 (only).

And that’s about all we’ve got ready now. More tomorrow. Hasta later – C