14 comments on “ALERT: XP10.10 beta 5 released

  1. performance (and shadows) worse than beta4. Will skip this one.

    (I really loose track of what they think and do. sorry to say so. they shoudl have focussed on 64-bit after the big bugs were ironed out and should have gone from there. all that HDR fixing and worsening and re-doing of the rendering engine, I fear will have to be gone through once again for 64-bit. I’m sooo tired of that sim, even AeroflyFS is more enjoyable).

  2. I really like AeroFly FS as well. Simple relaxation, great scenery. I’d have preferred more attention paid to things like navigation and a variety of weather and times of day, but it’s understandable given their intent.
    Beta 5? I’ll check out the shadowing. Performance seemed about the same to me.

  3. Hey Chip/Simon/FT…

    Any chance the sorting order for comments can be reverted to the old site’s “oldest at the top”? It’s kinda counterintuitive to finish reading an article from top to bottom, just to have to go then to the end of the page and then read the comments from bottom to top…

  4. Other than the shadow bug (which happens when clouds+HDR is enabled) the performance seems to be fine in 10.10b5.

    • Agree, performance is good, HDR porked, hard to say if HDR is still “glimmering” with shadow bug.

  5. wish i didnt update to beta 5, demo seemed alright but then did full update and the fps are lower than 10.04 , the sun light transparency on the horizon still is not fixed, acf scrolling in the quick flight/ acf selection menu still non existent, which makes it a pain to manually click unclick each folder and scroll the scroll bar with mouse cursor on it. beta 5 is not too good, seems 1 step forward 2 back each time vs just building upon and making each newer beta better so we can move on.

  6. this new view system blows, no more option for toggle 3d cockpit look and 3d cockpit hold. how are you suppost to freely look around the cockpit. i dont wanna assign hotkey buttons 5times only to have to remember the new key. if you wanted a stable camera in 3d, then assign 3d hold view or whatever it was. beta 5 is a pain in the ass performance wise and function. screw this

  7. Well beta 5 works very well for me. No noticable difference in frames that others have mentioned as far as I can tell (without testing properly). The new QL functions are excellent and I can’t understand why so many people are whining. If you don’t want to test a BETA version then don’t tick the BETA box for god sake!

    • Why not? as long as it is test on a demo install or a second install? Why not test it? There is no reason to update ones main install, though.

  8. I was paying attention to the beta releases but now instead, I am building my machine to run FSX until I see a somewhat, finished piece of software and then I may switch over from there.
    Rob

    I just don’t recall my X plane 10 saying “BETA” anywhere on the package, even in web advertisements.

    • Being a windows man myself, I sense your frustration. But anyone who knows xplane reasonably, knows the beta run will go for years! It’s part o the fun they tell us!

      So, tell us, what machine are u building? Will it be as good as the beast Im ORDERING IN 2 DAYS TIME!!?? Woohoo